Editing SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Zmario

{{Rfa close|failed}}

===[[User:Zmario|Zmario]]===
I believe I should be a sysop for the following reasons:

*Contributes Everyday
*Fills in Universe & Character Info
*Uploaded Many Pictures
*Made Almost all of the Event Matches
*I am a very helpful person
*I discuss my ideas
*I do not use profanity much (not even at all)
*Updates Music, Sticker, and Trophies info

If you ask, I'd say I'd be a good canidate for a sysop. Ask around. I'm sure people will vouch for me. [[User:KazMx|KazMx]] knows that I update alot, ask him! Thanks for your time and consideration for reading this. Even if i don't get sysop status I will still do my part to help smash fans everywhere :).

:I strongly '''oppose''' giving this user any administrative powers. Not to be a bitch, but this user's contributions are a regular nuisance and I often have to go back and clean up after them. Many pages created by this user end up getting deleted. I mean, it's not all bad contributions, but there's too many iffy ones to let me think that it's a good idea to make this user an admin/sysop. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' -  <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 21:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

:I'll go with neutral, leaning oppose: I'm not sure the candidate wants the tools for the right reasons... --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 06:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

:I'm going to have to '''oppose''', doesn't seem like the right time or reason. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 04:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

:I'm very '''opposed''' to this person becoming a sysop.  Most of his pages are complete jokes or just one step past that.  And his comments on the tier forum about deleting the page on the wiki about tiers make me worry that he will just go around deleting any legitimate page he disagrees with while protecting his jokes and pet projects. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] 03:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
::Not long after posting my previous comment, I can across even more damming evidence against this person.  I recently had to mark a page he made for deletion because he openly said on the talk page that he made the whole thing up because it "sounded right."  This isn't acceptable action by a normal user, let alone a sysop.  I'm still '''opposed''' and I haven't seen any other users of the wiki who support this person becoming a sysop.  I believe that it is time to close this discussion.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] 18:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

One word '''Opposed''' [[User:Kperfekt722|Kperfekt722]] 21:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
	You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.
	Log in	Create account
Description	What you type	What you get
Italic	''Italic text''	Italic text
Bold	'''Bold text'''	Bold text
Bold & italic	'''''Bold & italic text'''''	*Bold & italic text*
Insert common text
Signature	~~~~
Symbols	£ ¥ ° ± × ÷ € ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥
Diacritics	À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö Ø Œ Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ø œ ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ
Wikitext	[] [[]] \| [[Category:]] [[File:]] #REDIRECT: [[]] {\| \|- \|\| \|}
Templates	{{cleanup}} {{image}} {{reflist}} {{stub}} {{d}} {{delete}}
Formatting	<!----> <br> <code></code> <gallery></gallery> <nowiki></nowiki> <ref></ref> <references/> {{#widget:YouTube\|id=}}
Substitution	<includeonly></includeonly> <noinclude></noinclude>