Editing SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Cheezperson
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!-- inserted with: template:rfa close --> | |||
'''''Result:''' Failed. While Cheezperson is an active editor, the comments in the oppose section speak to why he is not presently to be promoted to sysop. Most notably, his lack of any major back-end edits or need for the tools has defeated him. Also, lack of support from the administration is almost always a kiss of death for an RfA. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 23:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)'' | |||
=== [[User:Cheezperson|Cheezperson]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cheezperson|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Cheezperson|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Cheezperson|RFA page]]) === | === [[User:Cheezperson|Cheezperson]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cheezperson|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Cheezperson|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Cheezperson|RFA page]]) === | ||
''Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.'' | ''Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.'' | ||
Line 66: | Line 69: | ||
*'''Neutral''' - There are one or two too many statements in the application that say that you deserve this, when in fact you should let your actions speak for your words. I won't oppose, as I think those were in good faith rather than bad, but they put me in the middle of the teeter totter rather than on one side or the other. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[User:Sky2042|w]]) 05:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | *'''Neutral''' - There are one or two too many statements in the application that say that you deserve this, when in fact you should let your actions speak for your words. I won't oppose, as I think those were in good faith rather than bad, but they put me in the middle of the teeter totter rather than on one side or the other. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[User:Sky2042|w]]) 05:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:Failed RfAs]] | |||
[[Category:Resolved RfAs]] | |||
</div> | </div> |