Editing SmashWiki:Only revert once

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Warning You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{repealed policy|Policy effectively replaced by [[SmashWiki:Edit warring]]}}
{{policy}}
{{shortcut|[[SW:1RV]]}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
*Do not revert another user's revert on an article, especially on matters of opinion. Use the talk page to reach consensus or at least a compromise before any additional revisions occur.
*Do not revert another user's revert on an article, especially on matters of opinion. Use the talk page to reach consensus or at least a compromise before any additional revisions occur.
**''Exception'': In cases of obvious vandalism, this rule does not apply. This also includes edits that violate other policies (e.g removing talk page messages), or edits that an administrator has deemed counterproductive.
**''Exception'': In cases of obvious vandalism, this rule does not apply.
**''Exception'': For obviously false information, such as a user adding [[Mewtwo]] as a character in ''Brawl'', this rule does not apply. However, users '''must''' remember to [[SW:AGF|assume good faith]].
**''Exception'': For obviously false information, such as a user adding [[Mewtwo]] as a character in ''Brawl'', this rule does not apply. However, users '''must''' remember to [[SW:AGF|assume good faith]].
*Do not revert another user's revert because it is in violation of this policy. This will only escalate the problem.
*Do not revert another user's revert because it is in violation of this policy. This will only escalate the problem.
Line 14: Line 15:
'''''However, such revisions should be used only once.'''''
'''''However, such revisions should be used only once.'''''


Since many articles contain matters of both fact and opinion, disputes about notes, trivia, or other content will inevitably occur. Indeed, it's very tempting to simply revert back to the edit you made previously, and just adding a summary explaining why, but this is still a bad idea. If your edit has been removed, use the article's talk page to discuss the information in question, and why it was removed or readded. Explain what you think about the info, and why you think that. As long as general consensus is reached, the edit(s) in question will be restored/deleted. With the proper use of talk pages, many conflicts can be resolved peacefully- and without an edit war.
Since many articles contain matters of both fact and opinion, disputes about notes, trivia, or other content will inevitably occur. If your edit has been removed, use the article's talk page to discuss the information in question, and why it was removed or readded. Explain what you think about the info, and why you think that. As long as general consensus is reached, the edit(s) in question will be restored/deleted. With the proper use of talk pages, many conflicts can be resolved peacefully- and without a edit war.


{{helpnav}}
{{helpnav}}

Please note that all contributions to SmashWiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see SmashWiki:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: