Editing SSB Code of Conduct Panel
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:CodeofConduct.png|thumb|right|250px|The logo of the Code of Conduct Panel]] | |||
[[File:CodeofConduct.png|thumb|250px|The logo of the Code of Conduct Panel]] | The '''SSB Code of Conduct Panel''', formerly known as the '''Harassment Task Force'''. is a group of community members dedicated to enforcing and recommending bans for individuals within the competitive scene involved in harassment, abuse, or any other misdemeanors. The formation of the panel was announced on April 12th, 2018<ref>[https://smashboards.com/threads/creation-of-a-harassment-task-force.454180/ "Creation of a Harassment Task Force" - Smashboards post by Roboticphish]</ref> with a formal opening announced on September 11th, 2018.<ref>[https://smashboards.com/threads/the-ssb-community-code-of-conduct.458342/ "The SSB Community Code of Conduct" - Smashboards post by Roboticphish]</ref> The project was initially organized by [https://smashboards.com/members/roboticphish.230296/ Josh Kassel] but is now managed by [https://twitter.com/drpiggyphd Kyle Nolla]. | ||
The '''SSB Code of Conduct Panel''', formerly known as the '''Harassment Task Force''' | |||
The panel was formally disbanded on December 14th, 2020 following an overwhelming amount of reports received during the [[2020 Super Smash Bros. sexual misconduct allegations]]. A statement published the same day explained that the panel "would need five or ten years" to go through all the reports received during the summer.<ref>[https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1srgobs The panel formally shuts down]</ref> | The panel was formally disbanded on December 14th, 2020 following an overwhelming amount of reports received during the [[2020 Super Smash Bros. sexual misconduct allegations]]. A statement published the same day explained that the panel "would need five or ten years" to go through all the reports received during the summer.<ref>[https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1srgobs The panel formally shuts down]</ref> | ||
==Procedure== | ==Procedure== | ||
The panel operated by having tournament organizers accept a signatory agreement in which any ban recommended by the panel would be enforced in any following tournaments. When a report was received, a group of community representatives selected by the panel would go over the report to determine the legitimacy and severity of the report. The severity of an offense was determined via the use of a 4-level system of offenses. A [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jj7_EMUK5r6wF0ESbU9sq__zpRzhIUjOtF4Vbx5wBJ4/ public document] was released detailing how the panel operated in further detail. | The panel operated by having tournament organizers accept a signatory agreement in which any ban recommended by the panel would be enforced in any following tournaments. When a report was received, a group of community representatives selected by the panel would go over the report to determine the legitimacy and severity of the report. The severity of an offense was determined via the use of a 4-level system of offenses. A [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jj7_EMUK5r6wF0ESbU9sq__zpRzhIUjOtF4Vbx5wBJ4/ public document] was released detailing how the panel operated in further detail. | ||
===Levels of severity=== | ===Levels of severity=== | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
|Level 1 offenses||Abuse of equipment, breach of event clothing, serious attacks on character, inappropriate and deliberate physical contact,<br> behaving in a threatening matter, deliberate obstruction of a player, using obscene or offensive language, match manipulation, unwanted sexual attention | |Level 1 offenses||Abuse of equipment, breach of event clothing, serious attacks on character, inappropriate and deliberate physical contact,<br> behaving in a threatening matter, deliberate obstruction of a player, using obscene or offensive language, match manipulation, unwanted sexual attention | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Level 2 offenses||Directed or malicious | |Level 2 offenses||Directed or malicious harrassment, threat of assault, panelists or signatories disclosing confidential information, releasing private information of a person | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Level 3 offenses||Physical assault, unreasonable or intentional act of violence, repeated and unwanted advances towards a player through online means, sexual misconduct, doxing | |Level 3 offenses||Physical assault, unreasonable or intentional act of violence, repeated and unwanted advances towards a player through online means, sexual misconduct, doxing | ||
Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
===Mew2Queen and CaptainZack case=== | ===Mew2Queen and CaptainZack case=== | ||
In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving {{Sm|CaptainZack}} and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by {{Sm|Pooch}}, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful.<ref>[https://twitter.com/BonsaiEnzo/status/1217936003144527872 Pooch's insight]</ref> On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1218610697552220161 Lifetime ban update]</ref> | In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving {{Sm|CaptainZack}} and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by {{Sm|Pooch}}, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful.<ref>[https://twitter.com/BonsaiEnzo/status/1217936003144527872 Pooch's insight]</ref> On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1218610697552220161 Lifetime ban update]</ref> | ||
In late June of 2020, growing sentiments would eventually evolve into a Twitter campaign advocating for CaptainZack's unbanning. This would spread in the form of the hashtag "UnbanCaptainZack". People supportive of the movement argued that CaptainZack's ban period was unjustifiably long. On June 28th, 2020, the Conduct Panel defended the ban by making a statement claiming that information, dynamics, and patterns of behavior that cannot be publicly shared led to the verdict.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1277290996871675906 CaptainZack update]</ref> | In late June of 2020, growing sentiments would eventually evolve into a Twitter campaign advocating for CaptainZack's unbanning. This would spread in the form of the hashtag "UnbanCaptainZack". People supportive of the movement argued that CaptainZack's ban period was unjustifiably long. On June 28th, 2020, the Conduct Panel defended the ban by making a statement claiming that information, dynamics, and patterns of behavior that cannot be publicly shared led to the verdict.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1277290996871675906 CaptainZack update]</ref> |