Editing SSB Code of Conduct Panel

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Warning You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 49: Line 49:


===Mew2Queen and CaptainZack case===
===Mew2Queen and CaptainZack case===
In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving {{Sm|CaptainZack}} and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by {{Sm|Pooch}}, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful.<ref>[https://twitter.com/BonsaiEnzo/status/1217936003144527872 Pooch's insight]</ref> On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1218610697552220161 Lifetime ban update]</ref>
In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving {{Sm|CaptainZack}} and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by {{Sm|Pooch}}, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful.<ref>[https://twitter.com/BonsaiEnzo/status/1217936003144527872 Pooch's insight]</ref> On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1218610697552220161 Lifetime ban update]</ref>


In late June of 2020, growing sentiments would eventually evolve into a Twitter campaign advocating for CaptainZack's unbanning. This would spread in the form of the hashtag "UnbanCaptainZack". People supportive of the movement argued that CaptainZack's ban period was unjustifiably long. On June 28th, 2020, the Conduct Panel defended the ban by making a statement claiming that information, dynamics, and patterns of behavior that cannot be publicly shared led to the verdict.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1277290996871675906 CaptainZack update]</ref>
In late June of 2020, growing sentiments would eventually evolve into a Twitter campaign advocating for CaptainZack's unbanning. This would spread in the form of the hashtag "UnbanCaptainZack". People supportive of the movement argued that CaptainZack's ban period was unjustifiably long. On June 28th, 2020, the Conduct Panel defended the ban by making a statement claiming that information, dynamics, and patterns of behavior that cannot be publicly shared led to the verdict.<ref>[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1277290996871675906 CaptainZack update]</ref>

Please note that all contributions to SmashWiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see SmashWiki:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: