Editing MediaWiki talk:Edittools
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Support, on one condition.''' I'd prefer it if the font was Arial like it is now, instead of that ugly Courier font. Of course, very few others will care. :P <span style="font-family:AR DESTINE">[[User:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:black">Air</span>]] [[User talk:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:orange">Conditioner</span>]]</span> [[File:AC.png|19px]] I am the air con. 16:34, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | '''Support, on one condition.''' I'd prefer it if the font was Arial like it is now, instead of that ugly Courier font. Of course, very few others will care. :P <span style="font-family:AR DESTINE">[[User:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:black">Air</span>]] [[User talk:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:orange">Conditioner</span>]]</span> [[File:AC.png|19px]] I am the air con. 16:34, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
'''Conditionally support'''. Nuking is an important tag that should be available for newcommers to the wiki to use. I see no reason why the stub and cleanup tags should be available but not nuking. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 16:37, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | '''Conditionally support'''. Nuking is an important tag that should be available for newcommers to the wiki to use. I see no reason why the stub and cleanup tags should be available but not nuking. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 16:37, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:'''I CACHINNATED MY FACE OFF'''. <s>Nuking is so redundant, it's unreal. It's basically speedy delete, except it doesn't put the nukeable articles in a category, and it doesn't have an icon on Recent Changes.</s> Nuke's only purpose is to put a smile on Semicolon's face, <s>and these hypothetical new users should learn how to type <nowiki>{{D}}</nowiki></s>. It is a joke system, and has no place in a serious template. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 18:24, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | :'''I CACHINNATED MY FACE OFF'''. <s>Nuking is so redundant, it's unreal. It's basically speedy delete, except it doesn't put the nukeable articles in a category, and it doesn't have an icon on Recent Changes.</s> Nuke's only purpose is to put a smile on Semicolon's face, <s>and these hypothetical new users should learn how to type <nowiki>{{D}}</nowiki></s>. It is a joke system, and has no place in a serious template. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 18:24, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
| Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
'''Oppose''' but only for removing the nuked template. Here's the thing. The nuked template is handy whenever you get something that's not worthy of debate but should merely be silenced undemocratically. It has immense power, and is frankly part of the culture and history of this wiki, a part of our history that we should hold on to and encourage practiced users to employ when necessary. If the opportunity arises, I will gladly demonstrate both the utility and the enormous satisfaction one gets when using it. It is also useful when you want to give somebody an example of what ''not'' to do, which is useful to the community as a whole, who get a wholesale example of what is not acceptable on this wiki. It does so in an unambiguous and salient way. Therefore, I oppose the removal of the nuked tag in the revised version of the editbox. Thanks you, ladies and gentlemen. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:49, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | '''Oppose''' but only for removing the nuked template. Here's the thing. The nuked template is handy whenever you get something that's not worthy of debate but should merely be silenced undemocratically. It has immense power, and is frankly part of the culture and history of this wiki, a part of our history that we should hold on to and encourage practiced users to employ when necessary. If the opportunity arises, I will gladly demonstrate both the utility and the enormous satisfaction one gets when using it. It is also useful when you want to give somebody an example of what ''not'' to do, which is useful to the community as a whole, who get a wholesale example of what is not acceptable on this wiki. It does so in an unambiguous and salient way. Therefore, I oppose the removal of the nuked tag in the revised version of the editbox. Thanks you, ladies and gentlemen. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:49, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
