Editing Forum:Smasher namespace
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This is kind of a continuation of the "Merging Problems" Help Desk topic. First I'd like to say I'm pleased with the main page merge and the count down timer on it. It looks like people are merging templates too so thats good. But still my biggest concern is the Smasher articles. It is evident that these aren't going to be merged with user pages or become redirects. So I'd like to have a vote to decide whether we make a Smasher namespace to separate these pages from the rest of our content. | This is kind of a continuation of the "Merging Problems" Help Desk topic. First I'd like to say I'm pleased with the main page merge and the count down timer on it. It looks like people are merging templates too so thats good. But still my biggest concern is the Smasher articles. It is evident that these aren't going to be merged with user pages or become redirects. So I'd like to have a vote to decide whether we make a Smasher namespace to separate these pages from the rest of our content. | ||
In defense of this idea the casual gamers and Wikia users will benefit by viewing articles about the smash bros. games when they click the random page button. Our article count will no longer be misleading since over 1300 articles are about Smashers. In some rare instances Smasher names take up the namespace for things in the games. For example: [[SmashWiki:Merge/Wario Bros.] compare to [[Wario Bros.]] And lastly it was never the SSB Wiki's intent to document players at all so this would be a good compromise. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 23:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | In defense of this idea the casual gamers and Wikia users will benefit by viewing articles about the smash bros. games when they click the random page button. Our article count will no longer be misleading since over 1300 articles are about Smashers. In some rare instances Smasher names take up the namespace for things in the games. For example: [[SmashWiki:Merge/Wario Bros.]] compare to [[Wario Bros.]] And lastly it was never the SSB Wiki's intent to document players at all so this would be a good compromise. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 23:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
==For== | |||
#[[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 23:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | #[[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 23:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
#[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | #[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
#'''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 07:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | #'''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 07:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#[[User:Tino768|Tino768]] 08:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | #[[User:Tino768|Tino768]] 08:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 10:23, 7 | #--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 10:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Against== | |||
# | #[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 21:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
#[[User:Crystal lucario|~Crystal_Lucario]] 13:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC) It is fine lets leave it. | #[[User:Crystal lucario|~Crystal_Lucario]] 13:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC) It is fine lets leave it. | ||
#[[User:ElbridgeGerry|ElbridgeGerry]] 22:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC) | #[[User:ElbridgeGerry|ElbridgeGerry]] 22:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 43: | ||
:As for your specific instance, the in-game term should take precedence of course. Any such need for disambiguation should always default to the in-game term. | :As for your specific instance, the in-game term should take precedence of course. Any such need for disambiguation should always default to the in-game term. | ||
:I cannot make a case ''against'' a separate namespace, as it does have merit. However, I would rather see something like a merge of all the lesser known into a [List of smashers]] with a small blurb on the items in T:Smasherbeta, as well as other information such as how they've done at tournaments. Obviously, 1300 would be a great deal to merge into one list, so disambig every 3 letters of the alphabet as needed. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [ | :I cannot make a case ''against'' a separate namespace, as it does have merit. However, I would rather see something like a merge of all the lesser known into a [[List of smashers]] with a small blurb on the items in T:Smasherbeta, as well as other information such as how they've done at tournaments. Obviously, 1300 would be a great deal to merge into one list, so disambig every 3 letters of the alphabet as needed. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 22:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I can't see what Randall00 is so concerned about. It's not as if the pages will be gone. However the great majority of the smasher articles I've seen do not qualify as Smasher articles at all according to the "Professionals" article "A professional gamer is one who regularly makes money off of the game and/or one who is recruited and sponsored by a notable organization, such as MLG." Now can you say that even 1/5 of those articles meet those qualifications or can be verified in any way? I can see that Randall00 is upset since you wrote many of these pages but the existence of these pages is an easy door for spammers to leave their mark permanently. Browsing through Smashers here are two examples of why I consider the article count misleading: [[LIBF]] LuisP. One is a '''13''' year old and another is well, LIBF. Kiddies and Crews aren't pros and ff you want me to find more examples I will. That's a real good 1300 pages, isn't it. So something must be done. Sky made a good suggestion. The point is it can't be left the way it is now so tell us what to do. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 04:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I can't see what Randall00 is so concerned about. It's not as if the pages will be gone. However the great majority of the smasher articles I've seen do not qualify as Smasher articles at all according to the "Professionals" article "A professional gamer is one who regularly makes money off of the game and/or one who is recruited and sponsored by a notable organization, such as MLG." Now can you say that even 1/5 of those articles meet those qualifications or can be verified in any way? I can see that Randall00 is upset since you wrote many of these pages but the existence of these pages is an easy door for spammers to leave their mark permanently. Browsing through Smashers here are two examples of why I consider the article count misleading: [[LIBF]] [[LuisP]]. One is a '''13''' year old and another is well, LIBF. Kiddies and Crews aren't pros and ff you want me to find more examples I will. That's a real good 1300 pages, isn't it. So something must be done. Sky made a good suggestion. The point is it can't be left the way it is now so tell us what to do. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 04:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::This merge happened well before the articles relating to the competitive community were up to a standard that I was proud of and am well aware of how many of the articles still need a lot of work (for instance, it was my intention to delete the absolutely atrocious [[Professionals]] article, so that's about the worst basis of comparison). Not my fault. There's a misconception that I'm upset because ''I'' wrote a lot of the articles which although true, is not the basis of my protest. My contributions are and always have been done in the best interest of the community at large. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 18:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | :::This merge happened well before the articles relating to the competitive community were up to a standard that I was proud of and am well aware of how many of the articles still need a lot of work (for instance, it was my intention to delete the absolutely atrocious [[Professionals]] article, so that's about the worst basis of comparison). Not my fault. There's a misconception that I'm upset because ''I'' wrote a lot of the articles which although true, is not the basis of my protest. My contributions are and always have been done in the best interest of the community at large. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 18:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 61: | Line 53: | ||
:::Bonko, ''all'' smashers are listed here that have taken the time to add a page, not just of professionals. A "smasher" by definition is just somebody who plays the game, like you and me (you do play, right? :). This misunderstanding may be part of your concern =). As to 13 year olds, it's a game that all ages can play, and a lot of those at young age get ''good'' at it (they usually have a lot of time on their hands...). Of course, your point is ''who are these people''? Which I'll respond with a rather generalized statement: Smashers. Randall does have a legit concern in that he's done a lot of work, and we don't really want to see that shoved under the table, if we can avoid it. Again, I stress the need for a policy regarding all of this, if not a guideline. | :::Bonko, ''all'' smashers are listed here that have taken the time to add a page, not just of professionals. A "smasher" by definition is just somebody who plays the game, like you and me (you do play, right? :). This misunderstanding may be part of your concern =). As to 13 year olds, it's a game that all ages can play, and a lot of those at young age get ''good'' at it (they usually have a lot of time on their hands...). Of course, your point is ''who are these people''? Which I'll respond with a rather generalized statement: Smashers. Randall does have a legit concern in that he's done a lot of work, and we don't really want to see that shoved under the table, if we can avoid it. Again, I stress the need for a policy regarding all of this, if not a guideline. | ||
:::I think I might collate what has been said for and against in conversations prior. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [ | :::I think I might collate what has been said for and against in conversations prior. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 05:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::You are industrious, what can I say... --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 18:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::You are industrious, what can I say... --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 18:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 75: | Line 67: | ||
::::::::Why are you fighting this? The articles will still be there, just in a different namespace, they'll have their own tab. It's not like we're petitioning to delete them all. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 18:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::::::Why are you fighting this? The articles will still be there, just in a different namespace, they'll have their own tab. It's not like we're petitioning to delete them all. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 18:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
*I'm going to weigh in and say that Smasher (and "Crew") pages should be in their own namespace. It is IMPOSSIBLE to use the Random Page function to browse items/techniques/other random things of interest, because 95% of the pages you get are smashers and crews, generally ones with ZERO actual rep. Players like Ken, M2K, Isai, Bombsoldier, etc | *I'm going to weigh in and say that Smasher (and "Crew") pages should be in their own namespace. It is IMPOSSIBLE to use the Random Page function to browse items/techniques/other random things of interest, because 95% of the pages you get are smashers and crews, generally ones with ZERO actual rep. Players like Ken, M2K, Isai, Bombsoldier, etc, that have actual notoriety might be justifiable here, but your average run-of-the-mill smahsers should be separate.--[[User:Wildfire393|Wildfire393]] 22:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I'm done talking. We'll let the community decide whether to move the pages or not. Keep in mind too that Smash Wiki's community was monumentally larger than the SSB Wiki's user base at the point of the merge. I hope you will reconsider reverting yoour contributions Randell00. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 01:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I'm done talking. We'll let the community decide whether to move the pages or not. Keep in mind too that Smash Wiki's community was monumentally larger than the SSB Wiki's user base at the point of the merge. I hope you will reconsider reverting yoour contributions Randell00. [[User:Bonko24|Bonko24]] 01:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 83: | Line 75: | ||
Erik: Actually, Guild: is a true namespace, and we disallow even redirects out of the main space and into the Guild / Server namespaces. | Erik: Actually, Guild: is a true namespace, and we disallow even redirects out of the main space and into the Guild / Server namespaces. | ||
Bonko: I will '''draft''' up a policy regarding this. Unlike WoWWiki, I believe smashers here should have redirects, wherever they end up (whether on lists or in a separate namespace). I will, however, pull directly from WoWWiki... I do have some experience there. ;) --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [ | Bonko: I will '''draft''' up a policy regarding this. Unlike WoWWiki, I believe smashers here should have redirects, wherever they end up (whether on lists or in a separate namespace). I will, however, pull directly from WoWWiki... I do have some experience there. ;) --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 04:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
'''Get them out of the main namespace'''. Wikia is not the place for vanity pages that have next to nothing to do with the game. The vast majority of users who visit the wiki are here for actual information, not subculture cruft written by egotistical self promoters and/or fanboys. I would prefer if these were moved to userspace, but a separate mainspace would be okay (though not preferable). Just get them away from the main focus of our project. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 18:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | '''Get them out of the main namespace'''. Wikia is not the place for vanity pages that have next to nothing to do with the game. The vast majority of users who visit the wiki are here for actual information, not subculture cruft written by egotistical self promoters and/or fanboys. I would prefer if these were moved to userspace, but a separate mainspace would be okay (though not preferable). Just get them away from the main focus of our project. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 18:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 91: | Line 83: | ||
:::Hehe, yep, that part is certainly true. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 21:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | :::Hehe, yep, that part is certainly true. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 21:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
=== Policy draft === | === Policy draft === | ||
[[User:Sky2042/Sandbox]] has a draft of a policy regarding this. Thoughts? I especially welcome yours Randall, as you essentially represent the minority view. I deliberately did not address crew pages, as I feel there is less a need for those to be relocated. The draft was essentially copied from the Guild policy there, with what I thought were acceptable changes in context. Of course, this can also be written as if there is no smasher namespace, which I will be happy to accommodate for if needed. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [ | [[User:Sky2042/Sandbox]] has a draft of a policy regarding this. Thoughts? I especially welcome yours Randall, as you essentially represent the minority view. I deliberately did not address crew pages, as I feel there is less a need for those to be relocated. The draft was essentially copied from the Guild policy there, with what I thought were acceptable changes in context. Of course, this can also be written as if there is no smasher namespace, which I will be happy to accommodate for if needed. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 02:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well nothing will convince me that it's a good idea to move smasher articles out of the main namespace. As you know, I'm more about buildling a strong front end presentation than I am about creating even more restrictions on what can and cannot be created in the back end. Especially when it comes to telling someone who is interested in the competitive game that their interest doesn't deserve a place among other tournament-goers. I don't know why something like this would be put in place that essentially discourages people from participating in the side of a community that really needs all the help it can get in garnering interest from casual gamers. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | :Well nothing will convince me that it's a good idea to move smasher articles out of the main namespace. As you know, I'm more about buildling a strong front end presentation than I am about creating even more restrictions on what can and cannot be created in the back end. Especially when it comes to telling someone who is interested in the competitive game that their interest doesn't deserve a place among other tournament-goers. I don't know why something like this would be put in place that essentially discourages people from participating in the side of a community that really needs all the help it can get in garnering interest from casual gamers. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, ok, we get that. Again, it can be written from a non-namespace PoV if need be; is there anything other than that which you disagree with in the body of the text? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [ | ::Yes, ok, we get that. Again, it can be written from a non-namespace PoV if need be; is there anything other than that which you disagree with in the body of the text? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] | [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 04:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | :::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 104: | Line 96: | ||
:I just thought of a new idea: What about a separate wiki? Several of Wikia's gaming communities, such as Halopedia, have a separate fanon Wiki. I think that this could be a good thing for the Super Smash Bros. Wiki. Not only could it have information on competitive gamers, but it could also include custom stages, etc. Just some food for thought. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 21:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | :I just thought of a new idea: What about a separate wiki? Several of Wikia's gaming communities, such as Halopedia, have a separate fanon Wiki. I think that this could be a good thing for the Super Smash Bros. Wiki. Not only could it have information on competitive gamers, but it could also include custom stages, etc. Just some food for thought. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 21:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::[http://www.proimpact.ca/smash/wiki/ Werd, dawg]. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | ::[http://www.proimpact.ca/smash/wiki/ Werd, dawg]. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I am a bit hesitant to create a new namespace for several reasons. Firstly, we only get three custom namespaces and as far as I know, their creation cannot be reversed. If we ever decide to reverse this decision, it might be impossible. Secondly, the pages attract the wrong type of attention for the wiki. They encourage people to make vanity pages as opposed to actual content. Our aim should be to create a reliable, professional wiki that is written from a neutral point of view. We had similar discussions on the [RuneScape:RuneScape Wiki|RuneScape Wiki]] a while back about [RuneScape:Forum:Delete the Forums|forum usage]] and [http://runescape.wikia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=52&st=0&sk=t&sd=a personal images]. The forums then were largely used for personal clan recruitment and trades as opposed to discussions on actually improving the site. Clearly that is what the forums are meant to be. | :I am a bit hesitant to create a new namespace for several reasons. Firstly, we only get three custom namespaces and as far as I know, their creation cannot be reversed. If we ever decide to reverse this decision, it might be impossible. Secondly, the pages attract the wrong type of attention for the wiki. They encourage people to make vanity pages as opposed to actual content. Our aim should be to create a reliable, professional wiki that is written from a neutral point of view. We had similar discussions on the [[RuneScape:RuneScape Wiki|RuneScape Wiki]] a while back about [[RuneScape:Forum:Delete the Forums|forum usage]] and [http://runescape.wikia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=52&st=0&sk=t&sd=a personal images]. The forums then were largely used for personal clan recruitment and trades as opposed to discussions on actually improving the site. Clearly that is what the forums are meant to be. | ||
:If you look at Special:Webtools, you'll see a list of the most common keywords that are searched for on our wiki. Not one of them is a smasher article. '''Very few''' readers visit our wiki for that type of material. Special:Top/most_visited will tell you the same thing. Overall, our community should be attempting to create articles that will actually interest the readers. Wikia should be a professional, collaborative effort. It should not be for pages that will only interest a very limited number of readers. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 23:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | :If you look at [[Special:Webtools]], you'll see a list of the most common keywords that are searched for on our wiki. Not one of them is a smasher article. '''Very few''' readers visit our wiki for that type of material. [[Special:Top/most_visited]] will tell you the same thing. Overall, our community should be attempting to create articles that will actually interest the readers. Wikia should be a professional, collaborative effort. It should not be for pages that will only interest a very limited number of readers. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 23:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
The 3 custom namespace limit is just so people don't request several, pointless namespaces. Uncyclopedia somehow got away with having 5. I'm all for having the smasher articles in there own namespace. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 23:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | The 3 custom namespace limit is just so people don't request several, pointless namespaces. Uncyclopedia somehow got away with having 5. I'm all for having the smasher articles in there own namespace. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 23:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Uncyclopedia is on a separate domain and has separate user accounts. Physically, it is about as affiliated with us as Wikipedia is. It is one of Wikia's sista projects, but the rules there seem to be slightly different... [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 23:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | :Uncyclopedia is on a separate domain and has separate user accounts. Physically, it is about as affiliated with us as Wikipedia is. It is one of Wikia's sista projects, but the rules there seem to be slightly different... [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 23:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::i cant think of any more off the top of my head, but only because i havent looked, but the best example of a Wikia wiki having more then 3 is [w:c:yugioh:Special:Export/Special:Export|yugioh]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy|Uberfuzzy]] 23:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | ::i cant think of any more off the top of my head, but only because i havent looked, but the best example of a Wikia wiki having more then 3 is [[w:c:yugioh:Special:Export/Special:Export|yugioh]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy|Uberfuzzy]] 23:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Just a note from the sidelines: if it would make reaching consensus any easier, just assume that the Smasher namespace would not count against your three namespace limit. The three additional namespace restriction is a policy restriction rather than a technical one, and because the need for the Smasher namespace would have arisen because of a merge, we wouldn't hold that against you if it ever became an issue. --[[User:KyleH|KyleH]]<staff /> <small>([[User talk:KyleH|talk]])</small> 03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | :::Just a note from the sidelines: if it would make reaching consensus any easier, just assume that the Smasher namespace would not count against your three namespace limit. The three additional namespace restriction is a policy restriction rather than a technical one, and because the need for the Smasher namespace would have arisen because of a merge, we wouldn't hold that against you if it ever became an issue. --[[User:KyleH|KyleH]]<staff /> <small>([[User talk:KyleH|talk]])</small> 03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
I think they should go. I used to prefer the old SSB Wikia simply because it '''didn't''' have articles on random people, and I'm sure there are others who agree. You guys have to remember, this was a MERGE. Not moving Smashwiki here. Besides, it creates to many problems. When you search pages on events, moves and such, occasionaly they have to have (move) behind 'em so the "smashers" get there glory. Look at [[Wario Bros.]]! And that page is linked by the events template! {{User:Max2/Sig}} I hope I've made my point to everybody. | I think they should go. I used to prefer the old SSB Wikia simply because it '''didn't''' have articles on random people, and I'm sure there are others who agree. You guys have to remember, this was a MERGE. Not moving Smashwiki here. Besides, it creates to many problems. When you search pages on events, moves and such, occasionaly they have to have (move) behind 'em so the "smashers" get there glory. Look at [[Wario Bros.]]! And that page is linked by the events template! {{User:Max2/Sig}} I hope I've made my point to everybody. | ||
:I've completely replaced that article with a redirect to the event match. That type of ambiguity is completely unacceptable. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 03:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | :I've completely replaced that article with a redirect to the event match. That type of ambiguity is completely unacceptable. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 03:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 119: | Line 111: | ||
:I've just contacted Wikia about it now. Smasher talk will automatically come with the namespace, and it'd be nice to keep in case people want to talk about that article. So the namespace should be in place within the next 3 days. I'll be sure to help out with the page moves to the namespace.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 04:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | :I've just contacted Wikia about it now. Smasher talk will automatically come with the namespace, and it'd be nice to keep in case people want to talk about that article. So the namespace should be in place within the next 3 days. I'll be sure to help out with the page moves to the namespace.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 04:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
