Information for "Forum:Is this game really more balanced than Brawl?"
Basic information
Display title | Forum:Is this game really more balanced than Brawl? |
Default sort key | Is this game really more balanced than Brawl? |
Page length (in bytes) | 9,287 |
Namespace | Forum |
Page ID | 20987 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
Edit | No extra protection (infinite) |
Move | No extra protection (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Mr. Anon (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 18:38, June 12, 2010 |
Latest editor | Max Elite (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:59, January 18, 2020 |
Total number of edits | 21 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Magic word (1) |
|
Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I often hear Melee player who hate brawl say "OMG Brawl nerfed Fox and MK is so cheap". While both of these are through, the statement is misleading. While many characters that were good in Melee were nerfed in Brawl, their nerfs were not that bad. This is compared to Kirby's nerf from smash 64 to Melee. Also consider that in Melee, because of really cheap wavedashing and L-Cancelling, Fox, Sheik, C. Falcon, Falco etc dominate, while Kirby, Ness, Pichu, Mewtwo and Bowser are so bad they are unplayable. Opinions? Mr. Anon 23:38, June 12, 2010 |