Editing Forum:De Facto Policies
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
Diese Seite ist offiziell in Englisch gehalten. | Diese Seite ist offiziell in Englisch gehalten. | ||
Ingles es | Ingles es el lenguaje oficial de este sitio. | ||
Use English, and please make at least a moderate attempt to spell check and type coherently. It doesn't matter how brilliant or insightful your posts are if nobody can understand them. | Use English, and please make at least a moderate attempt to spell check and type coherently. It doesn't matter how brilliant or insightful your posts are if nobody can understand them. | ||
Line 137: | Line 133: | ||
:::Semi: Firstly, the rules are all about posting in forums, and SmashWiki's an encyclopedia, so they don't really apply. Secondly, as Toomai said, policies from wikis are more likely to be appropriate to SmashWiki than policies from forum websites, as SmashWiki is a wiki, not a forum, so it is run like a wiki, not like a forum. Thirdly, the rules are kinda elitist, and demonstrate an attitude of "I can do what I like, because I'm an Administrator" (or at least, "I should be allowed to do what I like, because I'm an Administrator"). Fourthly, SmashWiki is in no way "private" - if someone has a severe problem with the way SmashWiki is being run by the Administration, they can contact Wikia Staff, who will then take appropriate action. Team Liquid mods may answer to no one, but we answer to Wikia. I don't like these policies - I agree with the spirit of some of them (like, always use good English, and don't troll or swear), but most simply don't apply, and I disagree with most of those that do apply. I'm confused. I normally agree with you and think what you say is sensible, but this leaves me almost lost for words. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 16:46, November 3, 2009 (UTC) | :::Semi: Firstly, the rules are all about posting in forums, and SmashWiki's an encyclopedia, so they don't really apply. Secondly, as Toomai said, policies from wikis are more likely to be appropriate to SmashWiki than policies from forum websites, as SmashWiki is a wiki, not a forum, so it is run like a wiki, not like a forum. Thirdly, the rules are kinda elitist, and demonstrate an attitude of "I can do what I like, because I'm an Administrator" (or at least, "I should be allowed to do what I like, because I'm an Administrator"). Fourthly, SmashWiki is in no way "private" - if someone has a severe problem with the way SmashWiki is being run by the Administration, they can contact Wikia Staff, who will then take appropriate action. Team Liquid mods may answer to no one, but we answer to Wikia. I don't like these policies - I agree with the spirit of some of them (like, always use good English, and don't troll or swear), but most simply don't apply, and I disagree with most of those that do apply. I'm confused. I normally agree with you and think what you say is sensible, but this leaves me almost lost for words. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 16:46, November 3, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I think that most of these are directed at forum use. And let's face it, most of the problems we've had have involved forums and/or user talk pages, so I understand how he could see these as being useful, even if they're a bit harsh. Especially true is the part about, as PoD said, "You are valuable." is not the same as "You are of exactly equal importance to all other users, without exception." I'm honestly getting fed up with the users who randomly show up here, contribute nothing of value, demand that some idea they have be implemented, and then YAV gets waved around as to why we have to give their idea a chance. The simple fact of the matter is that people who have been here longer have a better understanding of how things work, so when I defer to their opinion (and yes, this does sometimes include mine) it's perfectly logical and really shouldn't be considered a policy violation. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:04, November 3, 2009 (UTC) | ::::I think that most of these are directed at forum use. And let's face it, most of the problems we've had have involved forums and/or user talk pages, so I understand how he could see these as being useful, even if they're a bit harsh. Especially true is the part about, as PoD said, "You are valuable." is not the same as "You are of exactly equal importance to all other users, without exception." I'm honestly getting fed up with the users who randomly show up here, contribute nothing of value, demand that some idea they have be implemented, and then YAV gets waved around as to why we have to give their idea a chance. The simple fact of the matter is that people who have been here longer have a better understanding of how things work, so when I defer to their opinion (and yes, this does sometimes include mine) it's perfectly logical and really shouldn't be considered a policy violation. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:04, November 3, 2009 (UTC) | ||