From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.
|
Log in
|
Create account
|
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 30: |
Line 30: |
|
| |
|
| I have to disagree, Eruption and Shield Breaker are not similar in either function or visuals. Smash attacks, maybe I will concede your point there. Although the forward smash and down smash attacks may be somewhat similar in appearence (the down smash is pretty much the same amongst all sword characters) the differing characteristics of the respective character will alter the use of these moves and thus the character's play style. I belive that these differences mean that they cannot be considered even semi-clones.[[User:TWC Maca|TWC Maca]] ([[User talk:TWC Maca|talk]]) 22:45, June 12, 2010 (UTC) | | I have to disagree, Eruption and Shield Breaker are not similar in either function or visuals. Smash attacks, maybe I will concede your point there. Although the forward smash and down smash attacks may be somewhat similar in appearence (the down smash is pretty much the same amongst all sword characters) the differing characteristics of the respective character will alter the use of these moves and thus the character's play style. I belive that these differences mean that they cannot be considered even semi-clones.[[User:TWC Maca|TWC Maca]] ([[User talk:TWC Maca|talk]]) 22:45, June 12, 2010 (UTC) |
| :Ike's and Marth's counters have different frames, and are the only moves that come close to being similar. None of Ike's other moves are similar to Marth's and vice versa, so they're neither clones nor are they semi-clones. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 01:51, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::One can accuse their forward and down smashes of being similar or their neutral b just because they charge. But I find it ridiculous that some people actually consider them "semi-clones". [[User:Omega Tyrant|Omega Tyrant]] [[Image: TyranitarMS.png | 25px]] 02:08, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::Agreed. Kirby and Jigglypuff are more similar than them. [[Special:Contributions/98.111.95.78|98.111.95.78]] 14:59, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==The Real Answer==
| |
| Just check the article and you will know all of the clones, semi clones, and the luigified character of Brawl!! [[User:Doc King|Doc King]] ([[User talk:Doc King|talk]]) 17:57, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :To let you know, the article itself is based on what the smash community thinks, not what is actually true. Read the "Notes" section at the bottom of the [[clone|page]]. [[User:Omega Tyrant|Omega Tyrant]] [[Image: TyranitarMS.png | 25px]] 05:23, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
| |