Editing Broken

A classic example in the ''Super Smash Bros.'' series is {{SSBM|Fox}} when the fight occurs in [[Temple]] in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Melee]]'': he can outrun almost every other character on the massive stage, and can chip at the enemy by using his [[Blaster]] to fire shots, allowing him to easily time out a match and win by percentage. Another classic example of a broken tactic is [[wobbling]] which allows Ice Climbers to take a stock from any character from a single grab. These types of strategies are almost always deemed "broken" and action is taken to prevent it from impacting competitive play; for instance, the former would be addressed by banning Temple, and the latter would be addressed by banning use of the technique. The definition is, by nature, subjective, so what is generally considered broken often changes as the community evolves, particularly after the release on a new game. Despite this, broken elements are usually banned from tournaments, or users of them are at the very least frowned upon: if a broken element is not dealt with, the concern is that the game would simply degenerate into players trying to be the first to make use of it, as nothing else would prove effective. Many casual players instead believe all parts of the games should be allowed; however, due to many broken elements being extremely frustrating to play against, there is a general consensus that using them excessively, or at all, ruins the fun.  

*{{SSBB|Meta Knight}} in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]'' is the classic example, his legality having been disputed and experimented with for most of the game's competitive lifespan.

*{{SSB4|Cloud}} in ''[[Super Smash Bros. 4]]'' was considered by some to be broken in doubles due to his extreme advantages which allowed him to consistently win almost every match in double tournaments. This has been dealt with by banning him in certain tournaments.

*{{SSBU|Steve}}'s brokeness in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate]]'' is largely debated. People who think Steve is broken cite the incredible utility of every move he has, great recovery, and his ability to block attempts to intercept set ups, and create potentially near-unbeatable situations with his block placing mechanics. Particularly, the Phantom MLG tech which allows Steve to cancel hitstun and immediately counterattack has led many to argue that Steve should be banned from competitive play.

Though other characters have been at some points considered broken, none have been considered broken enough to be banned from most tournaments. In ''Brawl'', the {{SSBB|Ice Climbers}} were considered broken by many players, but a widespread ban was never enacted during ''Brawl''{{'}}s competitive life; following the release of ''Smash 4'', they have been occasionally banned at the few ''Brawl'' tournaments hosted, such as {{Trn|Glitch 2}}. ''Smash 4'' {{SSB4|Bayonetta}} was hotly debated to be broken, with some citing statistics<ref>[https://intheloop837.wordpress.com/2018/02/19/data-bayonetta-a-detailed-statistical-breakdown-of-smash-4s-most-controversial-character/ Bayonetta statistics]</ref> that show her to be very centralising, but because she didn't quite hit the standards of ''Brawl'' {{SSBB|Meta Knight}}, bans in high-level tournaments never caught on during Smash 4's lifespan.

Bosses can be considered broken if they are accessed through [[hacking]]. {{SSBM|Giga Bowser}} in ''Melee'' is an old, notorious example, with his [[Whirling Fortress]] equivalent having outright [[invincibility]] on start-up, massive amounts of movement potential, and extremely large hitboxes, making it almost unpunishable and resulting in an extremely warped metagame. {{SSBU|Master Hand}} in ''Ultimate'' is another example, being intentionally designed to defeat fighters very easily in his playable appearance. However, not all bosses are created equal, with examples like ''Smash 64'' {{SSB|Metal Mario}} being arguably worse than most of the cast, though they are generally kept banned due to crashes involving the [[results screen]] or other glitches that make organising tournaments difficult.

The term "broken" is often used colloquially to describe any strong or overpowered gameplay element, particularly one that is frustrating to play against. Though using the term in this way is not technically incorrect, as "broken" is an inherently subjective term, many discourage it, for misusing or overusing the term can lead to it undergoing {{iw|wikipedia|semantic bleaching}}, and prefer the use of alternate terms such as "OP", "stupid", or "insane", which are more in-line with the more emphatic uses of "broken".