Talk:Bayonetta

Ownership

So, just to clarify, Bayonetta's a third party, right? Laniv (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Yeah, Sega owns the franchise AFAIK. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 17:55, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Definitely. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:56, 15 December 2015 (EST)

They own publishing rights. Its technically PlatinumGames's series, however since Sega published the first entry in the series solo, they co own it. Bayonetta 2 is also partially owned by Nintendo due to them funding the second games development.
Ixbran (talk) 17:57, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Yeah she's Sega and Platinum's. Nintendo has some hold over the second Bayonetta game due to them funding it and an agreement with Platinum (which probably resulted in her playable cameo in Wonderful 101), but its still mostly Platinum's.

Here's the basic gist: SEGA owns the IP, Platinum owns the development. Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior 10:31, 17 December 2015 (EST)

So its like SE's Relationship with disney in regards to the KH series, right. I dunno the fact that Sega nearly ended the series simply because they didn't want to fund it, and then goes around to work on the Sonic boom series, really irks me. I really wish Nintendo would buy the IP from Sega.
Ixbran (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2015 (EST)

Human?

In her infobox it says she's a human, even though she's clearly an Umbra Witch. |:/ --72.250.149.164 10:51, 31 December 2015 (EST)

It was my understanding that an Umbra Witch is a clan, not a species.

Although, I would agree that calling her human is a little bit of a stretch. Might be better to just leave species blank. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:54, 31 December 2015 (EST)

Bayonetta Wiki says Umbra Witches was a clan, witch which Bayonetta is descended from.

That said, there's nothing on her page over there that states what species she is... Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior 10:59, 31 December 2015 (EST)