Should we add a protection to this article? Marioisawesome118 (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2011 (EST)
There isn't anything wrong about this page so why? .....HappyNew Year 19:48, 27 December 2011 (EST)
I would object protecting the article for now. It isn't vulnerable to the same speculation adding the SSB4 article is. OmegaTyrant 20:01, 27 December 2011 (EST)