Talk:Event 14: Sproutrage of the Flower Pikmin

Double linking

In case you haven't noticed, many articles link again if it is only in the infobox. MegaTron1XD 14:10, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Doesn't mean those articles have the "correct" style. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

It's generally agreed that it is ok to have a double link like so. Unless you plan on suggesting that all double links be removed, avoid removing double links. MegaTron1XD 14:21, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". MegaTron1XD 14:23, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

I disagree. Linking everything possible makes articles more cluttered. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Explain. MegaTron1XD 14:32, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Having too many links causes the reader to be distracted. if the first link in an infobox (like this scenario), it's fine, but don't use too many repeated links. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Whenever possible would mean that it should be used so long as it doesn't repeat itself after infobox usage. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. MegaTron1XD 14:39, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

Mistitled?

Is this event meant to be spelled 'sproutrage' or 'sproutage?' I can't access my Brawl disc at the moment to check. I'm gonna guess that it's 'sproutage' because 'sproutrage' isn't a word. --VeePickle (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2013 (EST)