SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Fried beef1
|
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Result: Yes. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Fried beef1Edit
From the pressuring of many of my friends on this wiki, I am running for rollback now. This would be a benefit, due to the fact that I am very active, made many vandal reverts to my name, and that I have not made any major disputes that will spark edit wars. This would be the farthest I shall attempt to achieve due to the fact that I see no point in me getting admin rights. Check this out if you still have doubts. Cheers!
Votes/CommentsEdit
- Strong Support It's about time, Beef! Honestly, he's an outstanding contributor, a great friend, and is very active. Not to mention how kind he is. Go for it! Blue Ninjakoopa 03:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support. That he's a "great friend" and "really kind" is really neither here nor there. That said, he is active, and a brief glance at his contributions reveals that he's got more than a handful of reverts, which is good enough for me. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- That was just plain unnecessary, dude. Not everything needs to benefit you. Think about other people for once. Blue Ninjakoopa 04:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Huh? I'm confused. The only time I mentioned myself in my vote is when I said that the candidate meets my standards, which is essentially synonymous with my vote of "support." If you're referring to my debunking of your vote, I disagree. While it wasn't strictly necessary in the sense that it wasn't related to the reasoning behind my own vote, far too many of the votes on requests for rollback (and on requests for adminship, for that matter) feature the same kind of specious reasoning, and I think it's more than appropriate (necessary, even) to address that fact. That said, your vote also featured some legitimate reasoning, but my point stands. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- By "suspicious resoning" you mean votes such as Pikabro's "You Go Girl" or other invalid reasons? Blue Ninjakoopa 04:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The word is "specious" (yes, I'm pedantic, get over it), which is to say, yes, since specious reasons, by definition, are false (i.e. invalid) reasons. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback#Reasons please. Yeah.Smoreking 2009 is coming! 13:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The word is "specious" (yes, I'm pedantic, get over it), which is to say, yes, since specious reasons, by definition, are false (i.e. invalid) reasons. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- By "suspicious resoning" you mean votes such as Pikabro's "You Go Girl" or other invalid reasons? Blue Ninjakoopa 04:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Huh? I'm confused. The only time I mentioned myself in my vote is when I said that the candidate meets my standards, which is essentially synonymous with my vote of "support." If you're referring to my debunking of your vote, I disagree. While it wasn't strictly necessary in the sense that it wasn't related to the reasoning behind my own vote, far too many of the votes on requests for rollback (and on requests for adminship, for that matter) feature the same kind of specious reasoning, and I think it's more than appropriate (necessary, even) to address that fact. That said, your vote also featured some legitimate reasoning, but my point stands. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- That was just plain unnecessary, dude. Not everything needs to benefit you. Think about other people for once. Blue Ninjakoopa 04:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The word is Support. He's an excellent contributor, and I've seen some decent vandal fighting. Good for you. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 05:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Support I knew you'd take my advice eventually. Active, good at heart, what else is there to say? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- About time. Support. The Steel Avenger Taste my cold steel!
- Reasons would help...Smoreking 2009 is coming! 14:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Everything I could say has been said. The Steel Avenger Taste my cold steel!
- SUPPORT! You have a bunch of reverts. Finally you ran!Smoreking 2009 is coming! 13:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- You go, guy! You would make for an awesome rollback. ParaGoomba348 19:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Um, why?Smoreking 2009 is coming! 20:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Anyone who's been paying attention should see that Friedbeef would be another valued addition to our anti-vandal team. Miles (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Everyone above me. Masterman 2009 20:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- You go girl You're a great user and you'd do well with rollback. And can Paragoomba348 please avoid ripping off my saying... PikabroPIKACHU! 05:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't it obvious? How many reasons can there possibly be? I would get sick of reading the same thing over and over. But, anyway, FriedBeef1 has a heap of reverts and is active. In the next generation of admins, I think we have one. Support. GutripperSpeak if you are worthy
- Thank you, Gutripper, but I will not be going for admin rights. Friedbeef1 1/26/09! 00:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- We'll see. :) GutripperSpeak if you are worthy
- Thank you, Gutripper, but I will not be going for admin rights. Friedbeef1 1/26/09! 00:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 00:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
