Can we find a less messily wide layout for this? I was thinking a 13-column layout would be a good layout for the first few tiers, but it's messier for the lower tiers... Miles (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2017 (EST)
- 17 wide, Parentheses equal fillers
- S and A: (2) + 4 + (1) + 8 + (2)
- B: (3) + 11 + (3)
- C: (3) + 11 + (3)
- D and E: 6 + 11
- F: (5) + 7 + (5)
- Try that? Miles (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2017 (EST)
- Funny, that's the same layout I had in mind. I just didn't know how to put it in.
Aidan, the Wandering Dragon Warrior
23:34, 1 March 2017 (EST) - Sounds good in theory. Let's see what it looks like. Serpent
King 23:36, 1 March 2017 (EST) - [1] Serpent King 23:59, 1 March 2017 (EST)
- I am unsure. Idk about anyone else, but I think it looks a little awkward. Not sure if there is any avoiding that though. Serpent King 00:03, 2 March 2017 (EST)
- Funny, that's the same layout I had in mind. I just didn't know how to put it in.
Ties
The SmashBoards article for the fourth tier list says:
"For the sake of placement differences between lists, we have given tied spots to characters whose average scores differed by less than 0.1."
This template needs to be changed to match the tier list. -- Ethan
(Discussion) 20:59, 11 December 2017 (EST)
- Feel free. Serpent
King 21:01, 11 December 2017 (EST)
- I'm fairly sure they only meant for those "ties" to matter when comparing placement differences between tier lists, not for rankings in the actual list itself. Otherwise it would have been made more evident that ties existed. Toomai Glittershine
The Brazen 21:42, 11 December 2017 (EST)
- I'm fairly sure they only meant for those "ties" to matter when comparing placement differences between tier lists, not for rankings in the actual list itself. Otherwise it would have been made more evident that ties existed. Toomai Glittershine