SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Archive 2

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

This is an archive of rollback requests in chronological order.

Passed

Aidanzapunk

• #1
• #2
• #3

(contributions) Aidan the Aura Master 14:58, 1 March 2015 (EST)

Result: Passed Toomai Glittershine The Non-Toxic 18:43, 1 March 2015 (EST)

ScoreCounter

• #1
• #2
• #3

(contributions) ScoreCounter 09:30, 14 March 2015 (EDT)

Result: ? Passed #2 is not the best example in a vacuum, but it could be justified given the editor's history, so I'm okay with it. Toomai Glittershine The Non-Toxic 10:00, 19 March 2015 (EDT)

Nyargleblargle

• #1
• #2 (I apologize for my snarkiness)
• And the one that made me feel that I needed rollback to combat troublesome edits, #3

(contributions) Nyargleblargle (Talk) 16:31, 1 June 2015 (EDT)

Result: ? Passed I'd never rollback #3, but I can see why other people would, so okay. Toomai Glittershine The Zesty 19:04, 17 June 2015 (EDT)

Failed

Awesomelink234

• #1
• #2
• #3

(contributions) Awesomelink234 is really feeling it! 07:10, 16 October 2014 (EDT)

Your first two links are the same. In addition, both that and the third link are reversions of the same "string" of vandalism. Please provide two other reversions from different sources. Toomai Glittershine The Bold 10:40, 16 October 2014 (EDT)

Should we just call this one as a failed request? The user I don't think have been active in a while and I don't think he has made improvements to his examples. Dots (talk) The Captain 16:04, 1 March 2015 (EST)

Result: Failed The user in question has not responded to request for improving credentials. Toomai Glittershine El Pollo 18:43, 1 March 2015 (EST)

Serpent King

• #1
• #2
• #3

Sorry, I wasn't sure to link my reversions or the offenders' revisions.
(contributions) Serpent∞King (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2015 (EDT)

Result: Failed It looks to me like you don't understand the purpose of the rollback tool. Your example 1 is clearly reversion of vandalism, but 2 and 3 are both good-faith edits by new users, and from the looks of things you would have used rollback on them simply because they involved more than one edit that you wanted to undo. That's not what rollback is for. Toomai Glittershine The Labbie 10:00, 25 September 2015 (EDT)