Talk:Mercenaries of the Dark Hunter

Add topic
Revision as of 20:21, December 18, 2007 by smashwikia>SMASH-Janitor

No. Just no. This is completely a discrimination of rights. It's been stated numerous times that SBF and SW are not to be linked in events like bans, by mods. The same logic should be applied to alliances. You may as well ban talking about Brawl and get sued for discrimination of rights.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggie smalls (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}

This crew has done nothing worthy of deletion. It has not once flamed other threads, spammed inconsistently, and has given good arguments and has and it shouldn't be stripped of its wiki page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by ismaR (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}

This is a great wiki page. I don't see how deleting it will do any good. It's supporting Dark Samus for Brawl and telling us more about him.—Preceding unsigned comment added by KraidGuy (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}

No. Just no. This is completely a discrimination of rights.
"Rights?" If you want to get technical, you have no rights here - this is a privately-owned website. The admins could ban you simply because they don't like your username and you'd have no legal ground to successfully sue them on. The judge would most likely laugh and throw your case out in a split-second.
It's been stated numerous times that SBF and SW are not to be linked in events like bans, by mods.
Whichever moderator(s) said that are completely and totally incorrect, as an admin has stated otherwise.
The same logic should be applied to alliances. You may as well ban talking about Brawl and get sued for discrimination of rights.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggie smalls (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}
First of all, any lawsuit brought against the site would invariably fail as this is a privately-owned website. You have no "free speech" rights here - the first amendment doesn't apply. Regardless, forum alliances are not crews: this has been discussed several times and we've come to the consensus that forum alliances should NOT have entries here. See Talk:The Rape Staff, Talk:M.M.P.M.A., Talk:Mog squad, Talk:The ♥♪!? Alliance, and Talk:S.S.S.
This crew has done nothing worthy of deletion. It has not once flamed other threads, spammed inconsistently, and has given good arguments and has and it shouldn't be stripped of its wiki page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by ismaR (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}
You're making the assumption that an article deletion is a form of punishment; generally, it's a method of removing inappropriate articles, particularly those that aren't quite up to par with SmashWiki standards. Being a good group of users doesn't award you the right to a Wiki entry if you aren't an actual crew. If this article is deleted, it's nothing personal (speaking strictly for myself, though I'd imagine the same would apply to whomever may delete this); it just makes no sense for this article to remain when other forum alliance articles have been deleted.
This is a great wiki page. I don't see how deleting it will do any good. It's supporting Dark Samus for Brawl and telling us more about him.—Preceding unsigned comment added by KraidGuy (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}
Not to be rude, but that really doesn't matter. Supporting a character does not suddenly make you deserving of a Wiki entry. The moment you guys actually act as a real crew (and start playing in tournaments representing this group), then you can have an article; at the moment, however, there's no reason at all for you all to have one. And when you consider that several other alliances articles have already been deleted for the same reason I flagged this one, it becomes a matter of applying the rules consistently and equally to everyone. To allow this page to stay when the others were deleted would be completely unfair to the members of those other alliances. – EP (TalkEdits) 21:37, December 17, 2007 (EST)

THIS? AGAIN? Why is there so many character support pages? As EP mentions above, this is not needed. I wish i was a sysop so i could delete this page.--Janitor ( TalkContribs) 20:21, December 18, 2007 (EST)