25,126
edits
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (→Neutral) |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
'''I would like to motion to make "do we need another one" be completely disregarded as a valid opposition.''' It is basically the antonym of the "why not" argument, which I think we can agree should '''NEVER''' be the basis of an argument for RfA/RfBs. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex Parpotta'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''flying lobster!'''</span>]]'' 15:16, 20 July 2017 (EDT) | '''I would like to motion to make "do we need another one" be completely disregarded as a valid opposition.''' It is basically the antonym of the "why not" argument, which I think we can agree should '''NEVER''' be the basis of an argument for RfA/RfBs. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex Parpotta'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''flying lobster!'''</span>]]'' 15:16, 20 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Question: Are there any bureaucrat actions in recent memory that you would have done differently? And why? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Hammer 18:41, 20 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
<!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfBs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | <!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfBs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:Active RfBs]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:Active RfBs]]</noinclude> |