User talk:98.157.202.185

Hello

Welcome to SmashWiki. Have you considered creating an account? Nyargleblargle (Talk · Contribs) 18:47, 29 September 2015 (EDT)

Thank you for the welcome :). As for account, something tells me I shouldn't just yet. Also, congrats for being a sysop! 98.157.202.185 20:50, 29 September 2015 (EDT)

I'd say more than 100 edits display enough commitment to warrant it. -Menshay (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2015 (EST)

Eh, 500 is better.98.157.202.185 22:34, 24 November 2015 (EST)

Still not going to make an account? You're effectively an established member of the community and it's a little strange. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 16:50, 22 December 2015 (EST)

I have to agree with Nutty. With all that you've done, I'd call you an established member of the community now, and I'd be more than happy to see you working as an official user. Disaster Flare (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2015 (EST)

Now you have three supporters. You've worked way too hard, and remaining just an IP isn't the best option at this point. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 17:17, 22 December 2015 (EST)

1.What will making an account do?

2.I'm worried that I'll become less focused on the mainspace and will be probated.98.157.202.185 18:28, 22 December 2015 (EST)

It will allow people to know your online, easier contact, and a more professional appearance, which will encourage new users to come to you for help (and I'm pretty sure you'd be more helpful than most users here). You could also eventually apply for rollback or admin and your contributions would be stored together instead of on two separate pages.

Having an account doesn't mean you have to have a userpage. You can just leave it out completely and you probably won't have a problem. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 18:34, 22 December 2015 (EST)

1. Wrong "your".

2. I honestly don't want any of that.98.157.202.185 00:08, 23 December 2015 (EST)

1) I'M SO DISAPPOINTED IN MYSELF ._. I must've been tired because I would never usually make that mistake :'(

2) It also makes you more recognizable and trustworthy. I know that I personally check every edit done by an IP because I don't trust them- too many IPs have been vandals. If you started using an account, I would know not to check yours because you are a trustworthy user. Also, it's safer because your IP address wouldn't be as easy to find if a creeper decides to stalk you. You don't want your Minecraft creations blown up, do you? ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:47, 23 December 2015 (EST)

1. I hate Minecraft.

2. Sadly, creating an account wouldn't change that. The person could just do simple math and find it out via the contribs I made.98.157.202.185 00:04, 24 December 2015 (EST)

1) I honestly don't that much either, but the reference was crying to be made xD

2) Technically true, but it seems a little weird that they would go to a user's page and figure out that they were once an IP user in order to stalk them particularly when there are so many others that use just IP addresses. Either way, the other point I made still stands. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 13:29, 24 December 2015 (EST)

These are all good reasons too ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 13:30, 24 December 2015 (EST)

Comment changing

As far as I've been told, you're allowed to change your comment until someone else responds. After that point though, it violates SW:TALK. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 16:39, 24 November 2015 (EST)

Oh. That doesn't make sense to me, but I'll revert my edit anyway.( Pretty much all of my edit have been reverted anyway XD )98.157.202.185 16:42, 24 November 2015 (EST)

That's generally true, though fixing spelling/grammar in your own messages is specifically called out as an exception to that rule. Oscuritaforze (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2015 (EST)

Edit summaries

SmashWiki is not censored, but that said, please refrain from...outbursts like this. It looks unprofessional. Thanks! Serpent King 19:56, 29 November 2015 (EST)

I am sorry. I was simply angry by the whole idea of that. 98.157.202.185 19:58, 29 November 2015 (EST)

One more warning of this in response to this. Thank you. Serpent King 23:40, 19 December 2015 (EST)

Cross my heart, I'll stop. I am really sorry, and I hope I don't get blocked for this.98.157.202.185 23:44, 19 December 2015 (EST)

I am taking a break.

See everyone later! 98.157.202.185 14:10, 25 December 2015 (EST)

...and I'm back, folks! 98.157.202.185 12:37, 27 December 2015 (EST)

whats this

this Nintendofan1653 (talk) the true north strong and free 12:02, 3 January 2016 (EST)

SK hid my revision 'cause I mentioned someone I shouldn't have. 98.157.202.185 12:09, 3 January 2016 (EST)

Smasher images

Here's the thing: Like I said, smasher images are not in any way "required" or a "priority". Take Omega Tyrant's page for instance, he deleted his own picture from his page because he didn't want it on there. The way I see it, images on smasher pages are more of an "added bonus" than anything. My other issue with putting a tag on it is if we were to go by that route, then half of the entire smasher space would be tagged for an image and the list of tagged pages would be pretty close to a thousand by now. Disaster Flare (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2016 (EST)

Ah, ok. But don't disobey this policy next time. ;/ 98.157.202.185 21:47, 12 January 2016 (EST)

IP's got a point. But yeah, I agree with DF. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:48, 12 January 2016 (EST)

I know. I changed my mind and realized DF is right. 98.157.202.185 21:49, 12 January 2016 (EST)

To be fair, I did give my explanation why I broke the policy. I always make sure I give an explanation why I did it. Disaster Flare (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2016 (EST)

But see how easy it was to resolve it? Even if you have a reason, bring it up for discussion before reverting. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:52, 12 January 2016 (EST)

Per Nutta. Giving a reason isn't close to being an excuse to violate policy. 98.157.202.185 21:58, 12 January 2016 (EST)

I wasn't giving excuses, I was just stating what I do, but if you truly find it a problem, I'll try and be more careful about what I do in these cases. Disaster Flare (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2016 (EST)

That would be nice. I just hate seeing people ignore policies, however subtle it is. 98.157.202.185 22:04, 12 January 2016 (EST)

Sorry if people telling you this is bugging you

But I really think you should create an account. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 11:18, 16 January 2016 (EST)

(sigh) I won't create an account until I feel I have done as much work as ,say, you. 98.157.202.185 11:26, 16 January 2016 (EST)

Not to brag, but in that case...you have a loooooooooooong way to go. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 20:22, 18 January 2016 (EST)

What is your reasoning for waiting until you make more contributions? It will be easier to discern that it is you when you create an account. -- Ethan (Discussion) 20:27, 18 January 2016 (EST)

Ganonmew: Thank you for telling me I'm worthless. :(:(:(:(:(:(

Ethan: It's a goal for me. I love creating goals for myself.

98.157.202.185 20:32, 18 January 2016 (EST)

I don't believe that's what Ganonmew meant. I believe he meant he's contributed a lot, and it'd take a while to reach that point for anyone, really. Disaster Flare (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2016 (EST)

Still, I want to try my best to do what I can. 98.157.202.185 20:37, 18 January 2016 (EST)

If you have an account, you can keep track of your contribs a lot longer and you'd be easily credited for anything useful. IP address can change overtime thus resetting the amount of contributions. I once contributed as an IP then my IP changed and lost some track on my contributions. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is a never lover boy 20:44, 18 January 2016 (EST)

That honestly doesn't make any sense to me. I was not trying to ridicule Ganonmew in any way. I said more contributions, not any contributions or anything. -- Ethan (Discussion) 20:40, 18 January 2016 (EST)

@Ethan: I was talking to 98 if that's what you're referring to. Disaster Flare (talk) 20:45, 18 January 2016 (EST)