203
edits
Talk:Palutena (SSB4): Difference between revisions
→Palutena Attributes, why can't we mention her mix-ups and combos?: new section
(→So uh) |
|||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
Also worth checking: [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645495283057430528 1] [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645495610938777600 2] [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645496097935233024 3] [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:48, 21 September 2015 (EDT) | Also worth checking: [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645495283057430528 1] [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645495610938777600 2] [https://twitter.com/RandomTBush/status/645496097935233024 3] [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:48, 21 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Palutena Attributes, why can't we mention her mix-ups and combos? == | |||
I feel as if you are purposely not allowing people to mention specifics for low tiers. You don't even main Palutena, so you don't know. It is not speculation at all, it's the truth. Mentioning about how a move can be used does not mean that palutena is the best character. I don't what's bad about giving information on how a character can be used to the public. Yes palutena without customs is not good, but why is it a crime to mention some of her strengths especially with customs on? | |||