4,296
edits
Talk:Bowser (PM): Difference between revisions
→Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections?: new section
(→Side Smash Taunt?: new section) |
John3637881 (talk | contribs) (→Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections?: new section) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjCKCeAN1OU Bowser's side taunt with biting hitboxes, is that actually a thing? I have trouble performing Smash Taunts... [[User:Shadow|Shadow]] ([[User talk:Shadow|talk]]) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjCKCeAN1OU Bowser's side taunt with biting hitboxes, is that actually a thing? I have trouble performing Smash Taunts... [[User:Shadow|Shadow]] ([[User talk:Shadow|talk]]) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections? == | |||
I ask this because I feel some pages, {{PM|Bowser}} in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of ''Project M'' is covered in the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of ''Project M'' come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. ''Project M'' probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me? | |||