3,210
edits
User talk:Epsilon: Difference between revisions
→All of that information
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
::::::::::WHY DID YOU CHANGE IT ?! MY version is much better ! --[[User:Epsilon|Epsilon]] | ::::::::::WHY DID YOU CHANGE IT ?! MY version is much better ! --[[User:Epsilon|Epsilon]] | ||
Ok, first of all: four tildes go at the '''end''' of your comment, not the beginning. Just a heads up. | |||
Secondly, all of your edits past the first were flat out bad. You added reasons why your edit was good to the page, some of them in all caps, which could have very well gone in your edit summary. Never do that ever. | |||
Third of all, I think you're missing the point. We [[Template talk:Nerf|came to a decison]] that we should organize the changes by type, rather than buff-nerf-change. And we [[User talk:Epsilon#top|talk|also came to an agreement]] that adding 'damage reduced, from 10% to 7%' is a bad idea, unless the damage change is really that notable. | |||
Anything ya don't get out of this? <font face="sand">''[[User:Qwerty|<font color="black">Qw</font><font color="003F3F">er</font><font color="005F5F">ty</font>]] ''[[User talk:Qwerty|<font color="005F6F">(t</font><font color="003C6F">al</font><font color="000F7F">k)</font>]]</font> 18:49, 21 September 2014 (EDT) | |||