316
edits
Talk:Double jump: Difference between revisions
→New section just to make editing easier
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
So I'm still not done with this, and I don't yet feel like [[wikipedia:WP:BOLD|being bold]], [[wikipedia:WP:IAR|pulling rank]], and just moving it anyway. There is no advantage to keeping this titled as a term that can be proven is inferior in usage, which is explicitly the metric to how we name such pages. Also see my above spiel asking why this is considered different than "tech" vs "ukemi". [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomprehensible 23:34, 27 February 2014 (EST) | So I'm still not done with this, and I don't yet feel like [[wikipedia:WP:BOLD|being bold]], [[wikipedia:WP:IAR|pulling rank]], and just moving it anyway. There is no advantage to keeping this titled as a term that can be proven is inferior in usage, which is explicitly the metric to how we name such pages. Also see my above spiel asking why this is considered different than "tech" vs "ukemi". [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomprehensible 23:34, 27 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Still in '''support''' of moving to double jump. Nobody says "midair jump." You literally hear people say "Jigglypuff's third double jump." Wikis are based on the language used, not what should be technically used because it's more correct. I.e., a wiki is a derivative of the culture it documents, not the other way around. Double jump is the term used. Midair jump is also correct but never really heard. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 20:49, 2 March 2014 (EST) | |||