User talk:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers: Difference between revisions

User talk:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers (edit)

477 bytes added , 11 years ago

120

edits

Revision as of 01:50, November 19, 2013 (edit) Omega Tyrant (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Misinterpretation) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:07, November 19, 2013 (edit) (undo) FireMario1534 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Misinterpretation) Newer edit →
Line 122:		Line 122:

	:Additionally, never use your own ability with a character for determining how good the character is. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant\|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant\|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 01:49, 19 November 2013 (EST)		:Additionally, never use your own ability with a character for determining how good the character is. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant\|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant\|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 01:49, 19 November 2013 (EST)
			::You're telling me right now that tier lists explain which character is better in competitive play and tournament success is just one of the factors. But if there are, for example, very little tournament victories with Meta Knight, it would be impossible to know if Meta Knight is good in competitive play. I guess what I'm trying to is, what other major factors are there? [[User:FireMario1534\|FireMario1534]] ([[User talk:FireMario1534\|talk]]) 18:07, 19 November 2013 (EST)