SmashWiki:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
SmashPeter (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
SmashPeter (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Current requests== | ==Current requests== | ||
<br><code><nowiki> | <br><code><nowiki> | ||
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/SmashPeter}}</nowiki></code> | {{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/SmashPeter (#)}}</nowiki></code> | ||
[[Category:SmashWiki]] | [[Category:SmashWiki]] | ||
[[Category:Administration]] | [[Category:Administration]] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Requests for adminship}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Requests for adminship}} |
Revision as of 11:14, August 22, 2011
This is the page for requesting adminship for SmashWiki.
Rules & Regulations
- Only self-nominations are allowed. If you think that another member would make a good sysop, then you can convince them to nominate themselves. You cannot, however, make a nomination on behalf of another user.
- After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.
- Selections of sysops are not a simple vote count, or majority opinion. Users who wish to be promoted should demonstrate a steady commitment to this wiki, and be able to point to reasons that the sysop tools would allow them to do better editing.
- Candidates should describe why the wiki should want them to be sysops, not why they want to be sysops on the wiki.
- When supporting or opposing a candidate, give good reasons. Comments that describe in detail why the candidate should/should not become a sysop carry far more weight than simple support/oppose. Also, support comments that reference only edit count carry almost no weight in the selection process.
- Rollback status is not required for a successful RfA, but is highly encouraged. However, users who only want sysop tools for quick reverts of vandalism will be refused and directed towards the appropriate request.
- Upon request, a prospective sysop may be given a scenario and asked his/her opinion on how s/he would handle it.
- If a user has been blocked for any reason (except an IP auto-block or a wrong button click), s/he must wait a period of at least four months from the expiry of his/her ban until s/he may even be considered for adminship. Even after this time period has passed, the user should be prepared to answer questions about his/her block.
- For users that have had previous unsuccessful RfAs and are planning to open a new one, consider the reasons that the previous nominations failed. Has anything changed about you that would make a new nomination successful?
Past nominations
- For a list of all previous requests for adminship, please see this category.
- For a list of all previous requests for adminship that ended with the candidate's promotion, please see this category.
- For a list of all previous requests for adminship wherein the candidate was not promoted, please see this category.
How to nominate
If you have not had a request for adminship page before, follow this 2 step process.
- Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}
Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated. - Click on the created red link, and add:
{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}
However, if you have had a previous request for adminship, follow this process instead.
- Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username (#)}}
Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated, and where # is 2 for the second RfA, 3 for the third, and so on. - Click on the created red link, and add:
{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}
Current requests
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/SmashPeter (#)}}