16,439
edits
SmashWiki:New Logo Proposal 2: Difference between revisions
m
→Votes for Proposal A: Truth be, I slightly like D more than the current, despite it just being a rehash of it.
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Votes for Proposal A: Truth be, I slightly like D more than the current, despite it just being a rehash of it.) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#'''Support''' I find this logo to be more representative of the Smash series than the old logo. A cartoonish logo is more fitting for a Wiki about cartoonish games. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 04:09, 15 October 2010 (EDT) | #'''Support''' I find this logo to be more representative of the Smash series than the old logo. A cartoonish logo is more fitting for a Wiki about cartoonish games. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 04:09, 15 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
#:Seeing how other people have mentioned their dislike for other proposed logos and their reasons for doing so, I'll mention mine. Logo B's Wikipedia likeness is a major turnoff for me as it lacks originality and can be considered more or less a rip off. I noticed how one user mentioned how this logo looks "Nintendo-y", I would like to remind that this is not a Nintendo Wiki and the logo should be representative of the Smash Bros. series, not of Nintendo. While we do base a lot of our policies and such on what Wikipedia has, do we really need to base our logo off theirs? As for Logo C, it lacks creativity and is just rather plain. This logo is also just based on the Smash Ball design from Brawl, therefore it doesn't represent the original Smash Bros. or Melee well. A logo should be representative of the entire Smash series, not just Brawl. These two logos also don't have Master Hand, an iconic character that originates from the Smash series and could be considered the mascot of the series. As for the current logo, I have no qualms with it, but I prefer A to it. But should A not gain enough support, I would prefer to see the logo stay, and I especially don't want to see logo B become our logo. We're not affiliated with Wikipedia and our logo should not be a ripoff of theirs. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 02:27, 19 October 2010 (EDT) | #:Seeing how other people have mentioned their dislike for other proposed logos and their reasons for doing so, I'll mention mine. Logo B's Wikipedia likeness is a major turnoff for me as it lacks originality and can be considered more or less a rip off. I noticed how one user mentioned how this logo looks "Nintendo-y", I would like to remind that this is not a Nintendo Wiki and the logo should be representative of the Smash Bros. series, not of Nintendo. While we do base a lot of our policies and such on what Wikipedia has, do we really need to base our logo off theirs? As for Logo C, it lacks creativity and is just rather plain. This logo is also just based on the Smash Ball design from Brawl, therefore it doesn't represent the original Smash Bros. or Melee well. A logo should be representative of the entire Smash series, not just Brawl. These two logos also don't have Master Hand, an iconic character that originates from the Smash series and could be considered the mascot of the series. As for the current logo, I have no qualms with it, but I prefer A to it. But should A not gain enough support, I would prefer to see the logo stay, and I especially don't want to see logo B become our logo. We're not affiliated with Wikipedia and our logo should not be a ripoff of theirs. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 02:27, 19 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
#:I'm not a fan of D. It's just a rehash of the current logo, lacks creativity, and does not have the artistic flare of A. Seeing how others are doing it, my votes go from A > | #:I'm not a fan of D. It's just a rehash of the current logo, lacks creativity, and does not have the artistic flare of A. Seeing how others are doing it, my votes go from A > D > current > C >>> B. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 21:25, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
#OT just changed my vote back. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 22:26, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | #OT just changed my vote back. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 22:26, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
#This one actually looks kinda cool. Logo C just has a Smash Ball with SmashWiki slapped onto it. Doesn't look like much effort there. =P [[User:Ultrasonic2|Ultrasonic2]] ([[User talk:Ultrasonic2|talk]]) 16:03, 22 October 2010 (EDT) | #This one actually looks kinda cool. Logo C just has a Smash Ball with SmashWiki slapped onto it. Doesn't look like much effort there. =P [[User:Ultrasonic2|Ultrasonic2]] ([[User talk:Ultrasonic2|talk]]) 16:03, 22 October 2010 (EDT) | ||