Talk:Grapple Beam: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Your logic is horrible. First off, moves =/= trophies, so there goes your first sentence. | ::Your logic is horrible. First off, moves =/= trophies, so there goes your first sentence. | ||
::This grab is distinctive (obviously; try reading the article?), so no, making articles for everyone else's grab isn't necessary. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 23:12, August 10, 2010 (UTC) | ::This grab is distinctive (obviously; try reading the article?), so no, making articles for everyone else's grab isn't necessary. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 23:12, August 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Actually, yes, most attacks are notable enough for their own articles. As should be obvious, attacks that are unique to characters (i.e. special moves) and attacks that all share similar properties and are named as such do get articles. When there is overlap, we group the attacks in one article, cf. [[Reflector (move)|reflector]] and [[sex kick]]. But while the grapple behaves like many tether grabs/recoveries, it has enough of its own unique properties to merit an article. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 13:52, August 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:52, August 11, 2010
Keep separate - Notable enough. BNK [E|T|C] 22:11, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- So trophy articles aren't considered notable enough, but single attacks are? In that case, we should make an article about every character's grab. Sir Anon the great 23:05, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Actually, yes, most attacks are notable enough for their own articles. As should be obvious, attacks that are unique to characters (i.e. special moves) and attacks that all share similar properties and are named as such do get articles. When there is overlap, we group the attacks in one article, cf. reflector and sex kick. But while the grapple behaves like many tether grabs/recoveries, it has enough of its own unique properties to merit an article. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 13:52, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
