SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Shadowcrest: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Neutral: "vote" is the wrong word
m (→‎Neutral: "vote" is the wrong word)
Line 34: Line 34:
*'''Wondering''' why every one of your edits is "minor." <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 11:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Wondering''' why every one of your edits is "minor." <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 11:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
:Because I mark them minor by default (look in preferences, you'll see the box somewhere). Does that somehow make me less capable?  --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">Shadow</font>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">crest</font>]]</font> 15:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
:Because I mark them minor by default (look in preferences, you'll see the box somewhere). Does that somehow make me less capable?  --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">Shadow</font>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">crest</font>]]</font> 15:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
::Not necessarily, but it suggests an unfamiliarity with the userface. I often toggle off minor edits when combing the recent changes, so all of your revisions would vanish. Additionally, tagging minor edits appropriately is a common courtesy to people perusing contributions or history as it indicates which revisions are likely to be full of content and which are not. And I happened to run afoul this problem when combing through your contributions to judge this request for adminship. While your contributions are of high quality (though I'm not yet convinced they demonstrate a need for the administrative mop; I need to take a closer look to cast my vote one way or the other), such behavior brings into question your understanding of the controls and/or basic courtesy to other members. <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 16:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
::Not necessarily, but it suggests an unfamiliarity with the userface. I often toggle off minor edits when combing the recent changes, so all of your revisions would vanish. Additionally, tagging minor edits appropriately is a common courtesy to people perusing contributions or history as it indicates which revisions are likely to be full of content and which are not. And I happened to run afoul this problem when combing through your contributions to judge this request for adminship. While your contributions are of high quality (though I'm not yet convinced they demonstrate a need for the administrative mop; I need to take a closer look to cast my opinion one way or the other), such behavior brings into question your understanding of the controls and/or basic courtesy to other members. <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 16:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! -->
<!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! -->
----
----
[[Category:Administration]]
[[Category:Administration]]
28

edits