9,822
edits
m (Gonna need a source on that. Never seen that in any official Smash media) Tag: Undo |
|||
Line 266: | Line 266: | ||
==In [[competitive play]]== | ==In [[competitive play]]== | ||
===Tier placement and history=== | |||
In the early metagame, most players believed Duck Hunt were worse than they were in ''SSB4'' due to ''Ultimate''{{'}}s game mechanics encouraging more aggressive gameplay, which contrasted Duck Hunt's more campy playstyle. Despite this, Duck Hunt's playerbase, most notably {{Sm|Raito}}, showed that their buffs from ''SSB4'' ensured their viability. As a result, Duck Hunt's perception in the community improved, with most people believing that they were as viable as they were in ''SSB4''. | In the early metagame, most players believed Duck Hunt were worse than they were in ''SSB4'' due to ''Ultimate''{{'}}s game mechanics encouraging more aggressive gameplay, which contrasted Duck Hunt's more campy playstyle. Despite this, Duck Hunt's playerbase, most notably {{Sm|Raito}}, showed that their buffs from ''SSB4'' ensured their viability. As a result, Duck Hunt's perception in the community improved, with most people believing that they were as viable as they were in ''SSB4''. | ||
However, Duck Hunt's results have since seen a slow decline, due to their playerbase stagnating and Raito's results declining. When coupled with Duck Hunt's worst flaws remaining mostly unaddressed, such as their mediocre KO potential and below-average ground game, the current consensus is that they are lower mid tier characters. | However, Duck Hunt's results have since seen a slow decline, due to their playerbase stagnating and Raito's results declining. When coupled with Duck Hunt's worst flaws remaining mostly unaddressed, such as their mediocre KO potential and below-average ground game, the current consensus is that they are lower mid tier characters, ranking 67th on the first and current tier list. | ||
===Most historically significant players=== | ===Most historically significant players=== |
edits