2,149
edits
SmashWiki talk:User pages: Difference between revisions
→Re-proposal
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Re-proposal: Typos :/) |
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
:::I still don't believe a rule should be made against posting negative or unwarranted opinions. If this wiki were full of angry and immature people who were constantly guilty of posting these kinds of comments, it then a rule might be practical for the purpose of toning down the conflict. But it's not, and I don't believe cases of offensive opinions have or will ever be frequent enough to warrant the need for a rule against them, especially when the rule restricts people's freedom. [[User:Mako Shark|<span style="color:#336891">Shark</span>]] <b>[[User talk:Mako Shark|<span style="color:#9bbed0">(talk)</span>]]</b> 16:04, September 27, 2010 (UTC) | :::I still don't believe a rule should be made against posting negative or unwarranted opinions. If this wiki were full of angry and immature people who were constantly guilty of posting these kinds of comments, it then a rule might be practical for the purpose of toning down the conflict. But it's not, and I don't believe cases of offensive opinions have or will ever be frequent enough to warrant the need for a rule against them, especially when the rule restricts people's freedom. [[User:Mako Shark|<span style="color:#336891">Shark</span>]] <b>[[User talk:Mako Shark|<span style="color:#9bbed0">(talk)</span>]]</b> 16:04, September 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::The Wiki may not be full of such people, but that doesn't mean it can't be and a policy is needed in the cases it does come up due to potential shit it can cause. Such a rule would be aiming to prevent such crap it does and will bring. It also doesn't restrict people's freedom in any way. Is it really so restricting to your freedom not to be able to openly rant how much you hate Danny on your userpage when you don't need to and nothing good will come out of it? Now please Mako Shark, try to refute the points I brought up instead of simply saying that the situation doesn't happen frequently enough and such a rule will restrict people's freedom. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 16:37, September 27, 2010 (UTC) | ::::The Wiki may not be full of such people, but that doesn't mean it can't be and a policy is needed in the cases it does come up due to potential shit it can cause. Such a rule would be aiming to prevent such crap it does and will bring. It also doesn't restrict people's freedom in any way. Is it really so restricting to your freedom not to be able to openly rant how much you hate Danny on your userpage when you don't need to and nothing good will come out of it? Now please Mako Shark, try to refute the points I brought up instead of simply saying that the situation doesn't happen frequently enough and such a rule will restrict people's freedom. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 16:37, September 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::# Something not happening with any regularity is indeed a reason not to write a policy. Policy is not meant to be all-encompassing. | |||
:::::# Your proposal by definition limits freedom. If I can't write what I believe on my userpage, my freedom has been restricted. End of story. <!-- Though obviously some restriction is fair. --> <span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 18:49, September 27, 2010 (UTC) | |||