27,479
edits
SmashWiki talk:Trivia: Difference between revisions
→Sub-bullets: new section
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) (→Awkwardly worded trivia: new section) |
(→Sub-bullets: new section) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Is it an interesting trivia point? I'm not necessarily enthralled by it, but I can see the argument. But is it really worth having if the average reader will have no idea what it's saying or, otherwise, it's just an awkwardly long or specific trivia point? No, not really. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 15:18, July 21, 2020 (EDT) | Is it an interesting trivia point? I'm not necessarily enthralled by it, but I can see the argument. But is it really worth having if the average reader will have no idea what it's saying or, otherwise, it's just an awkwardly long or specific trivia point? No, not really. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 15:18, July 21, 2020 (EDT) | ||
== Sub-bullets == | |||
:'''''Trivia should be organized into a single-level bullet point list.''' Sub-bullet points are not allowed; all too often, they are used for a pseudo-conversational addendum to an existing trivia point. Any trivia that would be formatted that way either should be condensed into a single, more cohesive bullet point, or removed for excessive complexity. | |||
Any opposition to adding this? If I see another dang trivia point that's three bullet points deep, I swear... [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 23:19, October 27, 2021 (EDT) | |||