2,489
edits
Forum:Limiting American bias in Notable Player Sections: Difference between revisions
Forum:Limiting American bias in Notable Player Sections (edit)
Revision as of 10:51, March 24, 2021
, 3 years agobetter wording
m (plague review your edits properly challenge) |
(better wording) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* As a compromise, this can be applied to all countries, but this is a less direct answer to the problem. However, for some illusion of equality, I am open to its exploration, and see merit in it considering there are some Japan-centric character metagames with similar issues. | * As a compromise, this can be applied to all countries, but this is a less direct answer to the problem. However, for some illusion of equality, I am open to its exploration, and see merit in it considering there are some Japan-centric character metagames with similar issues. | ||
* If no player qualifies, at least at a macro-state level, then this policy has no effect on that section. | * If no player qualifies, at least at a macro-state level, then this policy has no effect on that section. | ||
The end result is that only the best players from America will be allowed on notable player sections, thus | The end result is that only the best players from America will be allowed on notable player sections, thus lowering the potential for American players to overshadow players from other regions that would otherwise lose notability as a direct result of unintentional American exceptionalism. | ||
==Support== | ==Support== | ||