SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Disaster Flare (2): Difference between revisions

SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Disaster Flare (2) (edit)

Revision as of 14:31, March 18, 2016

7 bytes added , 9 years ago

m

→‎Neutral

MuteSpittah

951

edits

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 #<s>'''leaning to support''' i think we have enough sysops [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the Pumpkin Pie 18:24, 4 March 2016 (EST)</s>
 #'''Neutral'''. His [[Special:EditCount/Disaster Flare|edit count]] shows he contributed a lot to the wiki, but he didn't really display why SmashWiki should want him to be a sysop. I don't think we ''need'' another admin (which isn't a good reason ''not'' to be an admin, if a user proves them self as helpful and as qualified as another admin, they shouldn't be disqualified because of this), but I can't imagine SmashWiki being worse off with him, as he seems pretty knowledgeable and professional. I don't see any harm either way. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 18:49, 4 March 2016 (EST)
-#'''Neutral'''. DF is doing this RfA at an opportune time; we have a vandal problem, but vandals are easy to spot and their shit is easy to deal with. I also don't see what new DF can bring to the table (though that's not a requirement) and I don't see his dispute skills being that extraordinary (unless he can give any good examples). So on one hand, he's being smart with the timing, and he's done so much and is highly capable of being a good Admin; on the other hand, any other time (like the last) he wouldn't be needed, and there are some issues, namely lack of examples of dispute handling and some issues of logic I see with his editing. Hence my neutral stance. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 17:15, 6 March 2016 (EST)
+#<s>'''Neutral'''. DF is doing this RfA at an opportune time; we have a vandal problem, but vandals are easy to spot and their shit is easy to deal with. I also don't see what new DF can bring to the table (though that's not a requirement) and I don't see his dispute skills being that extraordinary (unless he can give any good examples). So on one hand, he's being smart with the timing, and he's done so much and is highly capable of being a good Admin; on the other hand, any other time (like the last) he wouldn't be needed, and there are some issues, namely lack of examples of dispute handling and some issues of logic I see with his editing. Hence my neutral stance. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 17:15, 6 March 2016 (EST)</s>
 ==== Comments ====