2,051
edits
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Disaster Flare (2): Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Disaster Flare (2) (edit)
Revision as of 21:20, March 12, 2016
, 9 years ago→This is complete bullshit why can't I have a vote?!
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:::"'''Strongly oppose''': he got me blocked. If you love me, you'll deny this request " | :::"'''Strongly oppose''': he got me blocked. If you love me, you'll deny this request " | ||
:::''Wow. Amazing. Very strong vote. I'm sure it'll matter.'' The vote isn't going to mean anything, but I don't see how starting a shit show over a vote that won't even affect the RfA is considered as the most valid and legit solution to dealing with an ip (<s>vandal</s>). <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 20:16, 12 March 2016 (EST) | :::''Wow. Amazing. Very strong vote. I'm sure it'll matter.'' The vote isn't going to mean anything, but I don't see how starting a shit show over a vote that won't even affect the RfA is considered as the most valid and legit solution to dealing with an ip (<s>vandal</s>). <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 20:16, 12 March 2016 (EST) | ||
::::Since it simply doesn't get through your head, let me say it again. ''Did you read the vote?'' That clearly infers that he may have been a vandal previously, and it's disruptive. It's '''spam''', which we revert. [[User:Penro|'''Penro''']][[File:PenroDarkPitHead.png|19px]] [[File:PenroZSSHead.png|19px]] 20:20, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||