Talk:Corrin: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Aidanzapunk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Before this escalates, and since the point on Bayonetta being the first third-party female character is allowed to stand, I propose that we wait until the DLC comes out and see if either avatar is clearly portrayed as LGBT in Smash Bros. If they are, we can mention the point. If not, there is no need to mention the point at all. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:#090">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: #f00;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 12:50, 17 December 2015 (EST) | Before this escalates, and since the point on Bayonetta being the first third-party female character is allowed to stand, I propose that we wait until the DLC comes out and see if either avatar is clearly portrayed as LGBT in Smash Bros. If they are, we can mention the point. If not, there is no need to mention the point at all. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:#090">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: #f00;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 12:50, 17 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:Gender ≠ sexuality. Bayonetta being the first female third party character is important, but frankly, sexuality isn't. [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Space Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 12:51, 17 December 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 12:51, December 17, 2015
- shouldn't we list Corrin as a lgbt character in the trivia? 172.56.15.196
- We could, but given that it's a rather minor gameplay choice that isn't necessarily going to happen, and it's not really all that notable anyway, I would say no. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:08, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- 1. That's kinda unrelated to Smash Bros. 2. It's a rather minor gameplay choice, ans DatNuttyKid said. also, sign your comments with four tildes (~), not three tildes (~).
INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 10:10, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- there's plenty of articles making a big deal about it, so I really wouldn't call it minor. 172.56.15.196 11:57, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Name one.
Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior
11:58, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/fire-emblem-same-sex-marriage/ 172.56.15.196 12:02, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Either way, being gay is not related to Smash Bros in any way. We document Smash Bros, not LGBT trash! No offense, but your excuses are awkward. INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 12:11, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- it's a first for the series, I think it deserves to be mentioned. It's in no way "trash". 172.56.15.196 12:33, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Either way, being gay is not related to Smash Bros in any way. We document Smash Bros, not LGBT trash! No offense, but your excuses are awkward.
- http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/fire-emblem-same-sex-marriage/ 172.56.15.196 12:02, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Name one.
- there's plenty of articles making a big deal about it, so I really wouldn't call it minor. 172.56.15.196 11:57, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- 1. That's kinda unrelated to Smash Bros. 2. It's a rather minor gameplay choice, ans DatNuttyKid said. also, sign your comments with four tildes (~), not three tildes (~).
- We could, but given that it's a rather minor gameplay choice that isn't necessarily going to happen, and it's not really all that notable anyway, I would say no. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:08, 17 December 2015 (EST)
(Reset indent)
- I was referring to an article here, as I thought you meant the same.
- It doesn't really matter, it's not something that goes in the trivia of a page like this.
- INoMed, I take offense to that statement.
Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior
12:38, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- A character's sexuality in their home game is irrelevant to their Smash appearance. Thus, I don't think it should be included. Berrenta (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Just what I was going to say. Either way, we don't need the trivia. DekZek, The Festive Fighter
12:45, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Just what I was going to say. Either way, we don't need the trivia. DekZek, The Festive Fighter
Before this escalates, and since the point on Bayonetta being the first third-party female character is allowed to stand, I propose that we wait until the DLC comes out and see if either avatar is clearly portrayed as LGBT in Smash Bros. If they are, we can mention the point. If not, there is no need to mention the point at all. 
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 12:50, 17 December 2015 (EST)
- Gender ≠ sexuality. Bayonetta being the first female third party character is important, but frankly, sexuality isn't. Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior 12:51, 17 December 2015 (EST)
