Talk:Fighter/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
== DidYouKnowGaming video regarding "intended characters" for the Super Smash Bros. series ==
== DidYouKnowGaming video regarding "intended characters" for the Super Smash Bros. series ==


I'm not sure if information on this video should be added here. Just wanted to bring it to attention: <ref>http://youtu.be/3ciImvi3KCk</ref>[[User:SmashBrosFan|SmashBrosFan]] ([[User talk:SmashBrosFan|talk]]) 21:29, 3 November 2014 (EST)
I'm not sure if information on this video should be added here. Just wanted to bring it to attention: <ref>http://youtu.be/3ciImvi3KCk</ref> [[User:SmashBrosFan|SmashBrosFan]] ([[User talk:SmashBrosFan|talk]]) 21:29, 3 November 2014 (EST)


<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 21:30, November 3, 2014

"Lost" veterans

This may be semantics and something we may not have to consider for a while yet, but I'm wondering if there should be a distinction between two types of veterans for any particular installment: ones that appeared in the directly-preceding game (and thus were still "current" leading up to the new one) and those that were absent before returning in that installment. Obviously at this point in time, the only qualifying character would be Dr. Mario, but it's just something I've been thinking. Doc almost feels like he's between a veteran and being a newcomer again; after being absent in Brawl, he had to catch up on a lot of conventions it introduced once he returned, like a Final Smash or multiple taunts, and even more basic is that he hadn't been in a Smash game for over a decade before SSB4. Again, it may not be necessary to make the distinction at the current time, but something to think about for the future of the series if this potentially becomes more commonplace (for example - and this is a way-off hypothetical - Ice Climbers returning in SSB5, as I'd imagine that even if Smash goes the two-version route again, the next handheld will be able to handle them.) VinSymbol.pngVinLAURiA (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2014 (EDT)

Oh, and consider that the SSB4 site only labels newcomers as such and doesn't actually use an explicit "veteran" label as the Dojo did, so technically, Doc in SSB4 has never been officially called a veteran. Maybe it'd be a third category altogether, such as veterans, newcomers, and returnees? VinSymbol.pngVinLAURiA (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2014 (EDT)
LEt's see what tonight's show calls him. Guybrush20X6 (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2014 (EDT)
Well, turns out this just became more relevant quicker than I imagined. VinSymbol.pngVinLAURiA (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2014 (EDT)

Downloadable characters?

I think we should have some sort of way of differentiating downloadable characters besides just the note at the bottom, maybe coloring the slot yellow to match the eShop's theme. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zm123bro (talkcontribs) 13:21, 24 October 2014‎ (EDT)

I changed the background color of 3DS/Wii U Mewtwo gold. PikaSamus (talk) PikaSamus 12:26, 24 October 2014 (EDT)

Should we acknowledge alts?

I'm not saying alts. HAVE to be on the list, but shouldn't we at least mention them in the "footnotes" at the bottom of the list? I'm just saying we could put a special "note" next to the Villager, Wii Fit Trainer, and Robin stating that they can use male and female variants of themselves, and that Alph and the 7 Koopalings (Larry, Morton Jr., Wendy, Iggy, Roy, Lemmy, and Ludwig) are playable characters, but are only accessible via alternate "skins" of Captain Olimar and Bowser Jr., respectively. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashkirby (talkcontribs) 21:34, 29 October 2014 (EDT)

DidYouKnowGaming video regarding "intended characters" for the Super Smash Bros. series

I'm not sure if information on this video should be added here. Just wanted to bring it to attention: [1] SmashBrosFan (talk) 21:29, 3 November 2014 (EST)