276
edits
SmashWiki talk:Junior administrators: Difference between revisions
m
→Support: Edit
m (→Support: Why are replys using asterisks instead of colons?) |
m (→Support: Edit) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Support, but tweak''': Per everyone in general, but restrictions should be a bit tighter. It's not ''really'' "junior" if we're giving JAs pretty much all the core abilities that full administrators have. We don't need junior administrators being able to give blocks longer than, say, a week to autoconfirmed users. I believe only admins should be able to do that. Also, the policy (in its current state) states that JAs are able to protect pages, but not edit them. It should be the other way around, because allowing protecting, but not editing the protected makes no sense to me. [[User:Chilex|Chilex]] ([[User talk:Chilex|talk]]) 19:17, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | *'''Support, but tweak''': Per everyone in general, but restrictions should be a bit tighter. It's not ''really'' "junior" if we're giving JAs pretty much all the core abilities that full administrators have. We don't need junior administrators being able to give blocks longer than, say, a week to autoconfirmed users. I believe only admins should be able to do that. Also, the policy (in its current state) states that JAs are able to protect pages, but not edit them. It should be the other way around, because allowing protecting, but not editing the protected makes no sense to me. [[User:Chilex|Chilex]] ([[User talk:Chilex|talk]]) 19:17, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
**Junior administrators will be able to edit protected pages. I'm not sure where it says that they explicitly can't. And your suggestions were precisely my original intention when writing this policy, but again, according to Toomai, coding this for a usergroup is impossible, so the best I can do is discouraging doing anything more. <span style="font-family:Magneto">[[User:Air Conditioner|{{Color|Navy|Return of}}]] [[User talk:Air Conditioner|{{Color|#007BA7|Air Conditioner}}]]</span> [[File:AC.png|19px]] [[Special:Editcount/Air Conditioner|My edit count]] 19:25, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | **Junior administrators will be able to edit protected pages. I'm not sure where it says that they explicitly can't. And your suggestions were precisely my original intention when writing this policy, but again, according to Toomai, coding this for a usergroup is impossible, so the best I can do is discouraging doing anything more. <span style="font-family:Magneto">[[User:Air Conditioner|{{Color|Navy|Return of}}]] [[User talk:Air Conditioner|{{Color|#007BA7|Air Conditioner}}]]</span> [[File:AC.png|19px]] [[Special:Editcount/Air Conditioner|My edit count]] 19:25, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::At least don't allow JAs to protect pages. Leave that decision to the full-on admins. [[User:Chilex|Chilex]] ([[User talk:Chilex|talk]]) 21:10, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | :::At least don't allow JAs to protect pages. Leave that decision to the full-on admins. Unless coding for such a usergroup is impossible too. [[User:Chilex|Chilex]] ([[User talk:Chilex|talk]]) 21:10, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
*'''Support''' Great idea. I'm with everyone else on this one. It is so rare to see anyone request for full-on admin ship. Without junior adminship, future smart vandals will become more nuisance. Rollback isn't enough to solve any problems and we can't just sit there and while being defenseless against any malicious vandals. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 19:47, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | *'''Support''' Great idea. I'm with everyone else on this one. It is so rare to see anyone request for full-on admin ship. Without junior adminship, future smart vandals will become more nuisance. Rollback isn't enough to solve any problems and we can't just sit there and while being defenseless against any malicious vandals. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 19:47, 22 September 2014 (EDT) | ||