Forum:Artwork: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> No, this is not about the boxart debate, which has been sett…) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
No, this is not about the boxart debate, which has been settled (correct me if I'm wrong). This is about whether on character articles it's best for simply the most recent artwork of the character, or the latest artwork before their latest smash game. For example, for the [[Mario]] article, should we have artwork of Super Mario Galaxy on there, the latest main Mario game at the time of Brawl's release, or his Galaxy 2 artwork, the latest period? <choose><option><span style="color:red;">[[User:Mr. Anon|Mr.]]</span> <span style="color:green;">[[User talk:Mr. Anon|Anon]]</span> <span style="color:blue;">[[Special:Contributions/Mr. Anon|teh awsome]]</span></option><option>[[User:Mr. Anon|Anon]]</option><option>[[User:Mr. Anon|Sir]] [[User Talk:Mr. Anon|Anon]] [[Special: Contributions/Mr. Anon| the great]]</option></choose> 05:23, August 21, 2010 (UTC) | No, this is not about the boxart debate, which has been settled (correct me if I'm wrong). This is about whether on character articles it's best for simply the most recent artwork of the character, or the latest artwork before their latest smash game. For example, for the [[Mario]] article, should we have artwork of Super Mario Galaxy on there, the latest main Mario game at the time of Brawl's release, or his Galaxy 2 artwork, the latest period? <choose><option><span style="color:red;">[[User:Mr. Anon|Mr.]]</span> <span style="color:green;">[[User talk:Mr. Anon|Anon]]</span> <span style="color:blue;">[[Special:Contributions/Mr. Anon|teh awsome]]</span></option><option>[[User:Mr. Anon|Anon]]</option><option>[[User:Mr. Anon|Sir]] [[User Talk:Mr. Anon|Anon]] [[Special: Contributions/Mr. Anon| the great]]</option></choose> 05:23, August 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I'm honestly for having artwork up until Brawl's release. Information on games past ''Brawl'' isn't noteworthy, and that includes latest artwork. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 05:26, August 21, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:26, August 21, 2010
Forums: Index → Watercooler → Artwork
No, this is not about the boxart debate, which has been settled (correct me if I'm wrong). This is about whether on character articles it's best for simply the most recent artwork of the character, or the latest artwork before their latest smash game. For example, for the Mario article, should we have artwork of Super Mario Galaxy on there, the latest main Mario game at the time of Brawl's release, or his Galaxy 2 artwork, the latest period? Mr. Anon teh awsome 05:23, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
