Talk:Double jump: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | :it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | ||
::Ugh. '''No'''. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ::Ugh. '''No'''. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::that doesn't mean you can call people you dont even know a thing about idiots. --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | :::that doesn't mean you can call people you dont even know a thing about ''personally'' idiots. --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | ||