Forum:Crew namespace/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Explanation.
mNo edit summary
(Explanation.)
Line 82: Line 82:


:Well then, how about we just put the crew articles in the Smasher namespace?--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 18:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
:Well then, how about we just put the crew articles in the Smasher namespace?--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 18:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
:That I don't know would be so good either, because a crew isn't a smasher. Arutoa says a crew namespace would be personally beneficial to him, however.
:Perhaps one way we can look at it to find the ultimate solution is that, as with any other wiki, articles about players and groups of players of the games is pretty much vanity that a lot of encyclopedic folks would decry. Thus namespaces for smashers and crews (which is just putting "Smasher" and "Crew" before their article titles, really) is outright moral and sensible for these. But that's not the same as real-world tournaments/events and fansites, which at least have some more "official" relevancy to Smash fans than fellow players of which very few might even be encountered by Smash fans in their lives. Based on this, I feel it is justified that we have the vanity-ish Smasher and Crew articles in namespaces of some sort (whether they're separate namespaces or together we'll still have to decide), but have no need for putting any of the other articles into namespaces too. [[User:Erik the Appreciator|Erik Jensen]] <b><sup>([[User talk:Erik the Appreciator|Appreciate me here!]])</sup></b> 18:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)