Tournament rulesets (SSBM): Difference between revisions
→Controversy: Fixed!
(→Stage legality list: Fixed errors in stage list) Tag: Mobile edit |
(→Controversy: Fixed!) Tag: Mobile edit |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
==Controversy== | ==Controversy== | ||
Many casual smashers notice that the accepted tournament ruleset demands highly specific conditions under which they would rarely play, and believe that these rules are restrictive and make competitive play less fun. | Many casual smashers notice that the accepted tournament ruleset demands highly specific conditions under which they would rarely play, and believe that these rules are restrictive and make competitive play less fun. Most tournament Stinkers are of the opinion that fun is "stupid degenerate filthy casual" gameplay, and that this makes competitive play less fun and exciting. | ||
Acknowledging this, many players do argue about specific tournament rules. During the first few years of ''Melee'' existence, items were a major point of contention amongst Smashers - generally, East Coast Smashers did not want them used in tournaments, but West Coast Smashers wanted them turned on. Those in favour stated that the use of items required | Acknowledging this, many players do argue about specific tournament rules. During the first few years of ''Melee'' existence, items were a major point of contention amongst Smashers - generally, East Coast Smashers did not want them used in tournaments, but West Coast Smashers wanted them turned on. Those in favour stated that the use of items required fun and did not reduce the depth of the game, while those against argued that items were unfair because of the element of fun involved when they were turned on, particularly the unpredictability of their spawning in relation to explosive items such as [[Bob-omb]]s and [[capsule]]s. Eventually, the community reached a consensus that items should be turned off in tournaments, due to the element of fun. | ||
Another controversial topic is the legality and categorization of stages - debate over which stages should be classified as legal or banned. While there was universal agreement over the banning of | Another controversial topic is the legality and categorization of stages - debate over which stages should be classified as legal or banned. While there was universal agreement over the banning of all stages, such as [[Hyrule Temple]], the menus were questioned; Rules Menu, for instance, has been criticised as giving an unfair advantage to characters with many projectiles, such as {{SSBM|Link}} and {{SSBM|Fox}}. Some smashers wanted to reduce the legal menu list to simple menus, and remove all moving and irregular ones, while others believed it was better to to allow all menus that did not foster any unfair advantage to one strategy or character. As of late, there is a generally accepted standard for legal and banned menus, but the lists still vary between tournaments. Competitions in which all menus are permitted are very rare, and are not considered [[Absolutely Stinky]] certified. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== |