Talk:Vergeben leaks: Difference between revisions
→Minecraft
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
See this is my issue: under the strictest definition of the word "prove", there's no real way to know if that deal was the one Vergeben was talking about back then. That's just circumstantial evidence, which is not synonymous with "proof". - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 11:24, October 2, 2020 (EDT) | See this is my issue: under the strictest definition of the word "prove", there's no real way to know if that deal was the one Vergeben was talking about back then. That's just circumstantial evidence, which is not synonymous with "proof". - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 11:24, October 2, 2020 (EDT) | ||
I believe that the 5 year thing is more than enough proof, like, what else do you want? It's been proven that Minecraft in Smash was being discussed when Verge made the claim, the bottom line is Verge said Minecraft is coming to Smash at the time Minecraft in Smash was actually being discussed | I believe that the 5 year thing is more than enough proof, like, what else do you want? It's been proven that Minecraft in Smash was being discussed when Verge made the claim, the bottom line is Verge said Minecraft is coming to Smash at the time Minecraft in Smash was actually being discussed. [[Special:Contributions/86.150.21.139|86.150.21.139]] 08:57, October 3, 2020 (EDT) | ||