User talk:Porplemontage: Difference between revisions

User talk:Porplemontage (edit)

Revision as of 18:41, August 28, 2020

574 bytes added , 4 years ago

→‎RfA Protection

Porplemontage

Bureaucrats, Developers, Administrators

17,434

edits

Revision as of 18:13, August 28, 2020 (edit) ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk \| contribs) (→‎RfA Protection: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:41, August 28, 2020 (edit) (undo) Porplemontage (talk \| contribs) (→‎RfA Protection) Newer edit →
Line 313:		Line 313:

	Since you protected the [[SW:RFA]] page so that only autoconfirmed users can make RfAs, should SmashWiki policy be updated so that only autoconfirmed users can make RfAs since the autoconfirmed users page states that non-autoconfirmed users can technically make them? [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164{{#if:\|_({{{3}}})}}\|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164\|talk]]) is bad for me 18:13, August 28, 2020 (EDT)		Since you protected the [[SW:RFA]] page so that only autoconfirmed users can make RfAs, should SmashWiki policy be updated so that only autoconfirmed users can make RfAs since the autoconfirmed users page states that non-autoconfirmed users can technically make them? [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164{{#if:\|_({{{3}}})}}\|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164\|talk]]) is bad for me 18:13, August 28, 2020 (EDT)
			:The protection doesn't change much since non-autoconfirmed users already didn't have the ability to create an RfA subpage. Being able to add themselves to the list but not create the subpage was a mismatch whereby a user could get stuck halfway through the process (which has happened in the past). So now the abilities are proudly synced up. Whether it should be an actual rule or not is up for debate, but as it is now they just need someone to help them with it. --[[User:Porplemontage\|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage#top\|talk]]) 18:40, August 28, 2020 (EDT)