Talk:List of minor universes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Line 152: Line 152:
There's been ongoing discussion and action regarding whether ''Baten Kaitos'' should be considered a Namco property. I disagree on this one, since it's not grouped with other Namco series in contexts like spirits and music (as their only involvement was in publishing, not developing), and its only form of representation in ''Smash'' is through the Nintendo-published installment in the series. Although it's been mentioned earlier that it's ambiguous as to who actually owns the property, I'd also like to add that its sorting in ''Smash 4'' indicates it's meant to be taken as a Monolith Soft/Nintendo property rather than Namco. It's like, ''technically'' Namco, but not actually Namco in terms of its categorization. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 00:03, November 27, 2019 (EST)
There's been ongoing discussion and action regarding whether ''Baten Kaitos'' should be considered a Namco property. I disagree on this one, since it's not grouped with other Namco series in contexts like spirits and music (as their only involvement was in publishing, not developing), and its only form of representation in ''Smash'' is through the Nintendo-published installment in the series. Although it's been mentioned earlier that it's ambiguous as to who actually owns the property, I'd also like to add that its sorting in ''Smash 4'' indicates it's meant to be taken as a Monolith Soft/Nintendo property rather than Namco. It's like, ''technically'' Namco, but not actually Namco in terms of its categorization. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 00:03, November 27, 2019 (EST)
:And as an aside, the merge proposal mentions ''Tales'' as a similar example, but that comparison doesn't really work because the series is developed and published in-house by Namco, so there's no ambiguity whatsoever. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 00:07, November 27, 2019 (EST)
:And as an aside, the merge proposal mentions ''Tales'' as a similar example, but that comparison doesn't really work because the series is developed and published in-house by Namco, so there's no ambiguity whatsoever. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 00:07, November 27, 2019 (EST)
::I agree, and it seems that only the ''Origins'' is involved in the Smash, there is no other game.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 01:40, November 27, 2019 (EST)
::If can't determine who actually owns, and I think it's more reasonable to count it as the second-party. because it seems that only the ''Origins'' is involved in the Smash, there is no other game.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 01:40, November 27, 2019 (EST)
3,329

edits