Talk:List of rumors/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: '''Supporting''' the split once again --[[User:Tailikku|Tailikku]] ([[User talk:Tailikku|talk]]) 16:21, June 23, 2019 (EDT) | :: '''Supporting''' the split once again --[[User:Tailikku|Tailikku]] ([[User talk:Tailikku|talk]]) 16:21, June 23, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::I '''support''' Vergeben is clearly notable enough. [[User:Jf811|Jf811]] ([[User talk:Jf811|talk]]) 22:11, June 24, 2019 (EDT) | ::I '''support''' Vergeben is clearly notable enough. [[User:Jf811|Jf811]] ([[User talk:Jf811|talk]]) 22:11, June 24, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::'''Support.''' Clear notability. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 17:26, July 7, 2019 (EDT) | |||
== Milk-BOSATU rumor == | == Milk-BOSATU rumor == | ||
Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
:'''Support''' for reasons mentioned above. [[User:Awesomelink234|<span style="font-size:10pt;background:#00FF20;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px;color:#050DF7">Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer</span>]] [[User talk:Awesomelink234|Leave a message if needed]] 14:14, June 26, 2019 (EDT) | :'''Support''' for reasons mentioned above. [[User:Awesomelink234|<span style="font-size:10pt;background:#00FF20;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px;color:#050DF7">Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer</span>]] [[User talk:Awesomelink234|Leave a message if needed]] 14:14, June 26, 2019 (EDT) | ||
: I '''support''' this move. [[User:IPDude|The One IP Dude]] ([[User talk:IPDude|talk]]) 13:35, June 28, 2019 (EDT) | : I '''support''' this move. [[User:IPDude|The One IP Dude]] ([[User talk:IPDude|talk]]) 13:35, June 28, 2019 (EDT) | ||
'''Strong oppose''' because I think "leak" should instead be moved to "list of notable leaks", and this goes to "list of notable rumours". [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Interspacial 11:00, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | '''Strong oppose''' because I think "leak" should instead be moved to "list of notable leaks", and this goes to "list of notable rumours". [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Interspacial 11:00, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:'''Support in theory, but superseded''' by the other request. I'd prefer both to be "List of..." if they had to share a title. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 17:26, July 7, 2019 (EDT) |
Revision as of 16:26, July 7, 2019
Vergeben Split
Just to keep this topic relevant. I still support either splitting the Vergeben rumors into it's own page or migrating Vergeben's correct/confirmed leaks to the Leak page. Reason being the section is too large at over 9,000 bytes. The One IP Dude (talk) 05:18, June 20, 2019 (EDT)
- Last time, the admins decided on the discord (apparently; I don’t use discord) that Vergeben wasn’t notable enough. I heavily disagree with this notion. Vergeben is still talked about on reddit and gamefaqs, and I don’t even think Gemastu went on for this long. I’d argue that Vergeben is more notable than Gemastu based on how it’s been ongoing for over a year alone. Also, even if we shouldn’t split him, the fact that the only thing missing right now is a Minecraft boss doesn’t disqualify the fact that the rest of his info was correct. Since Loz18 is on both this page and the leaks page for his correct and incorrect content, we should leave the Minecraft mentions on this page, then move the rest over to the leaks page. Lou Cena (talk) 13:50, June 20, 2019 (EDT)
- I support this proposition. CardboardLuigi (talk) 14:07, June 20, 2019 (EDT)
- Supporting the split once again --Tailikku (talk) 16:21, June 23, 2019 (EDT)
- I support Vergeben is clearly notable enough. Jf811 (talk) 22:11, June 24, 2019 (EDT)
- Support. Clear notability. Bwburke94 (talk) 17:26, July 7, 2019 (EDT)
Milk-BOSATU rumor
There is a rumor going on right after E3 2019 that a Japanese twitter user named Milk-BOSATU (or niconico_test_1 at his twitter account) has sources related to one of the DLC fighters in the fighters pass.
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1050302553118859265
This one of the sources that Milk-BOSATU got right and this is just before Smash Ultimate was out and it said that the Hero from Dragon Quest will be in smash as a playable with alts based off other heroes (he also said that the hero doesn't have any female alts) and the Switch would have VR content, both of which are right (the Switch VR content is later revealed to be part of Nintendo Labo series and the Hero's alts are revealed in his trailer.).
Next up, Milk-BOSATU has sources given from his friend named, Mr. H and he stated that Mr. H went to Nintendo and saw one of the DLC fighters, here is a collection of links that Milk-BOSATU got from Mr. H.
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1073789370606354432
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1140068471037820930
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1140518695032070144
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1140584584477679616
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1141278892281307137
https://twitter.com/niconico_test_1/status/1141276425644695552
Here is so far we know about Milk-BOSATU's info on the next character.
- She is a female.
- She throws a weapon like a hammer or a boomerang.
- She looks like a fighting game character which means that she might not be from a game franchise with a fighting genre.
- She will come right after Banjo and Kazooie.
- She is not Neptune or Reimu.
- The 3D model of her doesn't have color (probably from a 3D software).
Would you put that into the rumors page? --Andreepika11233 (talk) 16:25, June 21, 2019 (EDT)
- I personally think it should. It's reminiscent of similar rumors. CardboardLuigi (talk) 19:00, June 23, 2019 (EDT)
Moving to "Rumors"
While I personally think it should be moved instead to "Rumor" (we don't call the leak page "Leaks" after all), it always bothered me that this page was called "List of rumors" while the leak page was simply called "Leak". - EndGenuity (talk) 17:00, June 23, 2019 (EDT)
- I support this move.--Tailikku (talk) 17:39, June 24, 2019 (EDT)
- I oppose this move. Simply calling it "rumor" sounds very incomplete. CardboardLuigi (talk) 21:38, June 24, 2019 (EDT)
- I'm in full swing support, but I'd call the page Rumors instead since we are talking about numerous rumors. -- Scorbunny (talk • contributions) 14:12, June 26, 2019 (EDT)
- Support for reasons mentioned above. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer Leave a message if needed 14:14, June 26, 2019 (EDT)
- I support this move. The One IP Dude (talk) 13:35, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
Strong oppose because I think "leak" should instead be moved to "list of notable leaks", and this goes to "list of notable rumours". Toomai Glittershine The Interspacial 11:00, July 6, 2019 (EDT)