7,414
edits
Talk:Banjo/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Split
SeanWheeler (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
(→Split) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::I think Aidan's point is that the only other instance of two separate characters fighting as one "entity" -- [[Duck Hunt]] -- isn't split. Therefore, it would be inconsistent to split Banjo and Kazooie but not the dog and ducks. Like I said, I personally would prefer splitting both. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 15:00, June 11, 2019 (EDT) | ::I think Aidan's point is that the only other instance of two separate characters fighting as one "entity" -- [[Duck Hunt]] -- isn't split. Therefore, it would be inconsistent to split Banjo and Kazooie but not the dog and ducks. Like I said, I personally would prefer splitting both. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 15:00, June 11, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::I oppose to the split because of Duck Hunt and Ice Climbers. If we split Banjo-Kazooie than Popo and Nana would need to be separated and so would the nameless dog and duck. And besides, we're Smash Wiki so we should have emphasis on the Super Smash Bros. series. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 16:45, June 11, 2019 (EDT) | :::I oppose to the split because of Duck Hunt and Ice Climbers. If we split Banjo-Kazooie than Popo and Nana would need to be separated and so would the nameless dog and duck. And besides, we're Smash Wiki so we should have emphasis on the Super Smash Bros. series. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 16:45, June 11, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::'''Weak oppose''' for the same reasoning. They're distinct as characters, yes, but they're very closely related in Smash and in their native games, just like Duck Hunt and the Ice Climbers. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 17:27, June 11, 2019 (EDT) | |||