5,586
edits
User talk:Lou Cena: Difference between revisions
→Non-Fighter Art
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
I think only ''Smash'' original content should have alternate art in the infobox. Like what you did for the [[Beam Sword]]. I don't think others that came from a non-''Smash'' game, like [[Heart Container]], should stay the same. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 02:18, 24 February 2019 (EST) | I think only ''Smash'' original content should have alternate art in the infobox. Like what you did for the [[Beam Sword]]. I don't think others that came from a non-''Smash'' game, like [[Heart Container]], should stay the same. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 02:18, 24 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:The thing is that the heart container’s design changed fairly significantly between smash games. On the other hand, the gallery mentions its game of origin, so I agree with you on some parts. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena#top|talk]]) 02:24, 24 February 2019 (EST) | :The thing is that the heart container’s design changed fairly significantly between smash games. On the other hand, the gallery mentions its game of origin, so I agree with you on some parts. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena#top|talk]]) 02:24, 24 February 2019 (EST) | ||
::I forgot some had the basis art/model outside of the infobox on the page. I guess in that case it ''could'' have them. I guess that'd only be if we (the Wiki) wanted to go though the effort out of fighters or original Smash elements. If we do, we just need to remember to '''generalize''' the infobox descriptions when adding the art. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 02:30, 24 February 2019 (EST) | |||