SmashWiki:Junior administrators (version 2): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Removing Deadlinks) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Requesting junior adminship== | ==Requesting junior adminship== | ||
Similar to the administrator application process, prospective users must create a | Similar to the administrator application process, prospective users must create a request for junior adminship. Users must be able to demonstrate trustworthiness and an understanding of the relevant tools in order to have a successful application; do not request junior administrator status solely for the sake of being a junior administrator. Having previously obtained rollback is not strictly necessary, but a record of its proper usage will be considered a major asset. | ||
{{notice|The relevant policy for RfJAs will only be constructed if this policy passes. It would be closer to an RfA than an RfR.}} | {{notice|The relevant policy for RfJAs will only be constructed if this policy passes. It would be closer to an RfA than an RfR.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:12, February 19, 2019
Different users have access to different functions of the site. While anyone can do most things on the site, including reading and editing, junior administrators can access a few additional functions to maintain the high standard of content on SmashWiki.
Abilities[edit]
In terms of access to tools, junior administrators are a midway point between rollback and full adminship. Their extra powers are:
- Deletion and undeletion of pages and images.
- Movement of pages without leaving redirects behind.
- Protection of pages so they cannot be edited.
Junior administrators also have all the powers of the rollback position.
What's the difference between a junior admin and a regular admin?[edit]
Some users may wish to obtain additional wiki-aiding tools without the hassle and expectations of being a full administrator. Examples of this division include:
- Juniors cannot edit fully-protected pages.
- Juniors cannot apply restrictions to users; they do not have access to the block tool, nor can they probate users.
- Juniors are not considered "staff"; they cannot edit wiki-wide text or stylesheets, do not have access to the wiki's e-mail or YouTube accounts, and are not treated as member-wiki-staff on the NIWA forums.
Junior admins are under some additional restrictions that are not mechanically enforceable by the wiki software:
- Juniors may only utilize their powers in a janitorial context - they may not use them to make or carry out a desicion.
- Example 1: Juniors may delete a spam page, replaced image, or broken redirect. They may not delete a page whose validity is under discussion.
- Example 2: Juniors may move an image to fix a spelling error or inappropriate name. They may not move a page whose name is under discussion.
- Example 3: Juniors may temporarily protect a page that is being vandalised or is hosting an edit war. They may not protect a page indefinitely, or unprotect a page just so they can edit it.
What's the same between a junior admin and a regular admin?[edit]
Just like full admins:
- Juniors may not use their powers to settle editing disputes.
- Juniors are not princes, and should not be treated any differently than any other user.
Requesting junior adminship[edit]
Similar to the administrator application process, prospective users must create a request for junior adminship. Users must be able to demonstrate trustworthiness and an understanding of the relevant tools in order to have a successful application; do not request junior administrator status solely for the sake of being a junior administrator. Having previously obtained rollback is not strictly necessary, but a record of its proper usage will be considered a major asset.
Consequences of overstepping bounds[edit]
It is virtually guaranteed that, at some point, a junior admin will break one of the position's non-enforceable rules for what they believe to be a good reason. In such cases, an administrator will review the situation to determine whether the action was justified, and hand the junior admin a number of "strikes" depending on the severity of the infraction:
- If the action was indeed justified, no strikes need be given.
- If the action was well-meaning but still outside the ruleset, one strike may be given.
- If the action was of questionable benefit, two strikes may be given.
- If the action would have been wholly unaccepbable for a full admin to carry out, three strikes may be given.
If a junior admin collects three strikes, they will be demoted; admins have the right to block juniors if they continue to abuse their powers before a demotion can be carried out.