Talk:Cape jump glitch: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Merge) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Aren't you an admin? Can't you move it yourself? [[User talk:Ac2k|<font color="Red">'''''Ac2k'''''</font>]] 21:54, 7 March 2013 (EST) | Aren't you an admin? Can't you move it yourself? [[User talk:Ac2k|<font color="Red">'''''Ac2k'''''</font>]] 21:54, 7 March 2013 (EST) | ||
Technically, it isn't supposed to multiply movement that has no hitstun, so it isn't just a property of the move. However, the glitch dosen't look like it will ever be expanded unless someone finds out how the glitch works. [[User:BlueRidiculous|<font color="blue">'''''Blue'''''</font>]][[User talk:BlueRidiculous|<font color="maroon">''Ridiculous''</font>]] 22:56, 7 March 2013 (EST) | |||
Even if it's not a glitch, it seems small enough and not requiring extensive info to be on the same page. [[User talk:Ac2k|<font color="Red">'''''Ac2k'''''</font>]] 07:20, 8 March 2013 (EST) | |||
'''Support'''-- There is absolutely no reason why a property of an attack should get it's own page, unless it's alright for pages like ''How Bower's Whirling Fortress can edge-guard'' or ''How Sonic's Homing Attack can create an infinite recovery'' to exist on their own.[[User:MegiBeelzebub|MegiBeelzebub]] ([[User talk:MegiBeelzebub|talk]]) 16:52, 29 March 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:52, March 29, 2013
Merge[edit]
I think that this page should be merged with Cape. I think it's just a property of the attack, since it also multiplies knockback by 1.5x. Ac2k 22:57, 16 February 2013 (EST)
Support --RoyboyX Talk 17:49, 7 March 2013 (EST)
The entire article can be summed up in one sentence. Merge it already. PenguinofDeath 17:50, 7 March 2013 (EST)
Aren't you an admin? Can't you move it yourself? Ac2k 21:54, 7 March 2013 (EST)
Technically, it isn't supposed to multiply movement that has no hitstun, so it isn't just a property of the move. However, the glitch dosen't look like it will ever be expanded unless someone finds out how the glitch works. BlueRidiculous 22:56, 7 March 2013 (EST)
Even if it's not a glitch, it seems small enough and not requiring extensive info to be on the same page. Ac2k 07:20, 8 March 2013 (EST)
Support-- There is absolutely no reason why a property of an attack should get it's own page, unless it's alright for pages like How Bower's Whirling Fortress can edge-guard or How Sonic's Homing Attack can create an infinite recovery to exist on their own.MegiBeelzebub (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2013 (EDT)
